He pitopito kōrero
News
News stories
UN committee calls for states to take action
The UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (the Committee) issued a General Recommendation which addresses states' obligations for the rights of Indigenous Women and Girls under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (the Convention).
General Recommendation No. 39 (CEDAW/C/GC/39) "identifies and addresses different forms of intersectional discrimination faced by Indigenous Women and Girls, and their key role as leaders, knowledge-bearers, and culture transmitters within their peoples, communities, families, and society as a whole."
The Committee identifies patterns of discrimination, including gender-based violence, and the factors that make discrimination worse, including a lack of access to justice.
They highlight that discrimination is often intersectional. The Committee calls on States to consider the full depth and diversity of Indigenous women's identities and the importance of Indigenous women's connection to their peoples, lands, natural resources, and culture. In paragraph 3 of the General Recommendation the Committee states:
"Intersectional discrimination against Indigenous Women and Girls must be understood taking into consideration the multifaceted nature of their identity. As Indigenous Women and Girls, they face discrimination and gender-based violence frequently committed by state and non-state actors. These forms of violence and discrimination are widespread and often remain in impunity. Indigenous Women and Girls also often have an inextricable link and relation to their peoples, lands, territories, natural resources, and culture."
In paragraphs 4 and 5, the Committee provides a more detailed explanation of the approach that States should take to prevent and address discrimination. It also says States must take an approach that:
- has a gender perspective
- is intersectional
- is intercultural
- is multidisciplinary.
The Committee examines a number of human rights and outlines specific obligations and recommendations for States under each human right. The rights addressed include:
- Equality and non-discrimination, with a focus on Indigenous women and intersecting forms of discrimination
- Access to justice and plural legal systems
- Prevention of and protection from gender-based violence against Indigenous women and girls
- Right to effective participation in political and public life
- Right to education
- Right to work
- Right to health
- Right to culture
- Rights to land, territories and natural resources
- Rights to food, water and seeds
- Right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment.
Specific to the prevention of and protection from gender-based violence, the Committee states:
"Gender-based violence against Indigenous women and girls undermines the collective spiritual, cultural and social fabric of Indigenous Peoples and their communities and causes collective and sometimes intergenerational harm."
The Committee calls for legal systems and services that respond to Indigenous women's experience of violence saying:
"States should have an effective legal framework and adequate support services in place to address gender-based violence against Indigenous Women and Girls. This framework must include measures to prevent, investigate, punish perpetrators, and provide assistance and reparations to Indigenous Women and Girls who are victims, as well as services to address and mitigate the harmful effects of gender-based violence."
The Committee notes that this applies to all levels of the legal system and the many organisations and individuals involved in the legal system saying:
"This general obligation extends to all areas of State action, including the legislative, executive, and judicial branches, at the national, regional and local levels, as well as privatized services. They require the formulation of legal norms, including at the constitutional level, and the design of public policies, programs, institutional frameworks and monitoring mechanisms, aimed at eliminating all forms of gender-based violence against Indigenous Women and Girls, whether committed by State or non-State actors."
There are 9 recommendations specifically addressing gender-based violence for state parties. See the full text of these recommendations below.
These are part of 69 total recommendations identified by the UN Committee "calling on states to immediately develop and implement comprehensive policies to better protect the human rights of Indigenous women and girls everywhere." Many of the recommendations from the other human rights categories relate to violence against Indigenous women.
Recommendations addressing the Prevention of and protection from gender-based violence against Indigenous women and girls:
"(a) Adopt and effectively implement legislation that prevents, prohibits, and responds to gender-based violence against Indigenous Women and Girls incorporating a gender, Indigenous Women and Girls, intersectional, intercultural, and multidisciplinary perspective, as defined in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this General Recommendation. Legislation and its implementation should also adequately consider the life cycle of all Indigenous Girls and Women, including those with disabilities;
(b) Recognize, prevent, address, sanction, and eradicate all forms of gender-based violence against Indigenous Women and Girls, including environmental, spiritual, political, structural, institutional, cultural violence, and that attributable to extractive industries;
(c) Ensure that Indigenous Women and Girls have timely and effective access to both non-indigenous and indigenous justice systems, including protection orders and prevention mechanisms when needed, and the effective investigation of cases of missing and murdered Indigenous Women and Girls free from all forms of discrimination and bias;
(d) Repeal all laws that prevent or deter Indigenous Women and Girls from reporting gender-based violence, such as guardianship laws that deprive women of legal capacity or restrict the ability of women with disabilities to testify in court; the practice of so-called “protective custody”; restrictive immigration laws that discourage women, including migrant and non-migrant domestic workers, from reporting such violence; and laws allowing for dual arrests in cases of domestic violence or for the prosecution of women when the perpetrator is acquitted;
(e) Ensure that support services, including medical treatment, psychosocial counselling, professional training, as well as reintegration services and shelters are available, accessible, and culturally appropriate for Indigenous Women and Girls who are victims of gender-based violence against women. All services should be designed with an intercultural and multidisciplinary approach, as described in paragraph 5 of this General Recommendation and be vested with sufficient financial resources;
(f) Provide resources for Indigenous Women and Girls survivors of gender-based violence to have access to the legal system to report cases of gender-based violence against women. These can include transportation, legal aid and representation, and access to information in their own indigenous languages;
(g) States should act with due diligence to prevent all forms of violence, inhumane treatment, and torture against Indigenous Women and Girls who are deprived of liberty. States must ensure that when these events do occur, they are appropriately investigated and sanctioned. States should also adopt measures to ensure that Indigenous Women and Girls deprived of liberty know where and how to report these incidents. States should also prioritize policies and programs to promote the social reintegration of Indigenous Women and Girls deprived of liberty, respecting their culture, views, and languages;
(h) States must adhere to their obligations under international human rights law and international humanitarian law in situations of armed conflict, including the prohibition of all forms of discrimination and gender-based violence against civilians and enemy combatants, and harm to land, natural resources, and the environment; and
(i) Systematically collect disaggregated data and undertake studies, in collaboration with indigenous communities and organizations, to assess the magnitude, gravity, and root causes of gender-based violence against Indigenous Women and Girls, particularly sexual violence and exploitation, to inform measures to prevent and respond to such violence."
Related news: Mana Wāhine Kaupapa Inquiry
In December 2018, the Waitangi Tribunal formally initiated the Wai 2700 Mana Wāhine Kaupapa Inquiry into historical and contemporary claims of prejudice to Māori women arising from Crown breaches of Te Tiriti o Waitangi. In the claimants’ view, the central question is the denial of the inherent mana and iho of wāhine Māori and the systemic discrimination, deprivation and inequities as a result.
Six tūāpapa (foundational/contextual) hearings were held in 2021 and 2022 throughout Aotearoa. According to the Manatū Wāhine | Ministry for Women, the next step in the Inquiry is research that will form the basis of the evidence that the Waitangi Tribunal will consider in the substantive phase of hearings. The Tribunal will commission 7 research projects. The Mana Wāhine Joint Research Committee is also facilitating projects in 6 research areas independent of the Tribunal. The Joint Research Committee is comprised of representatives from the Mana Wāhine claimant community, claimant counsel, Crown counsel, Manatū Wāhine and Tribunal research staff.
E-Tangata recently republished Ani Mikaere's essay, Māori Women: Caught in the Contradictions of a Colonised Reality, that explains why the colonisation of tikanga Māori has been so devastating for wāhine Māori.
Related news
Earlier this year, the UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences, released a report on violence against Indigenous women and girls. The report presents an overview of the main causes and consequences of gender-based violence against Indigenous women and girls. It also highlights good practices and challenges to access to justice and support services. The report includes 23 conclusions and recommendations for States.
He Waka Eke Noa is a Kaupapa Māori research project on Māori understandings of family and sexual violence. It is investigating the role of Māori cultural approaches to violence prevention and intervention. The research team shared early findings from the research. This includes a brief snapshot of a selection of data from the survey which focused on lifetime experience of state neglect, failure to protect, abuse and abuse of power, racism, breaches of Te Tiriti o Waitangi, police violence, overall impact of state violence on wellbeing for Māori, and strategies to manage impact on wellbeing. Shirley Simmonds (Raukawa, Ngāti Huri, Ngā Puhi), one of the He Waka Eke Noa researchers, also presented preliminary findings from the survey in a recorded webinar. Also see all recorded videos from the He Waka Eke Noa series of online webinars.
The UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women has released the list of issues and questions prior to the NZ Government's submission of the ninth periodic report of New Zealand. The Government's response to these issues and questions will form the 9th periodic report on New Zealand's implementation of CEDAW. This report is due to be submitted by the Government in July 2023. For more information see the Ministry for Women's information on CEDAW reporting.
Related media
The harsh and unregulated reality of online safety for indigenous women, NZ Herald, 25.10.2023
'Rampant' increase of digital harm on indigenous women, conference told, Stuff, 25.10.2023
Call for nominations to join Redress Design Group and Advisory Group
The Crown Response Unit for the Abuse in Care Inquiry is calling for nominations to the Redress Design Group and an Advisory Group. You can nominate yourself or another person.
Nominations close on 13 December 2022.
The Redress Design Group and Advisory Group will help develop proposals for ministers for a new redress system for survivors of abuse in care. The term ‘redress’ is actions and steps that set right the harms caused by a wrong, such as abuse. Redress can include apologies, counselling or financial compensation that help recognise and address the harm suffered by survivors of abuse in care. The call for nominations said the redress system will be "a new, independent, trauma-informed redress system, Puretumu Torowhānui, for survivors of abuse in care."
The Redress Design Group will have up to 10 members, plus a Chair. The Design Group will be supported by an Advisory Group of up to 20 members, with the ability to work in smaller groups as needed.
The call for nominations says "...the Redress Design Group will produce high-level design proposals to provide to the Minister for the Public Service in June 2023." It also says the Advisory Group will "...provide advice and feedback to the Design Group on major elements of the high-level redress design..."
Survivors of abuse in state or faith-based care and relevant experts can apply to join either Group. The call for nominations notes that "It is intended that the Redress Design Group and Advisory Group be made up mainly of survivors of abuse in care, because it is essential that survivors are at the centre of this process."
The Crown Response Unit media release stated "The Redress Design Group will have a Māori majority, because Māori were heavily over-represented in care. It will have a gender balance, and include wider survivor representation, along with experts." The call for nominations has more details about the skills and experience required. It is calling for survivors from a wide range of backgrounds and experiences including Māori, Pacific, Deaf and Disabled, rangatahi, LGBTQI, survivors of residential, faith-based and State care, survivors from rural areas and survivors who have been in prisons or gangs.
See the call for nominations to download and submit a nomination form to the Crown Response Unit.
Information and the nomination form are available in different languages and alternative formats.
Background
In December 2021, the Royal Commission published its report on redress, He Purapura Ora, he Māra Tipu | From Redress to Puretumu Torowhānui. The report’s main recommendation was to set up a new puretumu torowhānui scheme. When the report was released, the Government announced that a new redress system would be developed, with Public Service Minister Chris Hipkins saying "The new system will be designed from the ground up in collaboration with Māori, who were heavily over-represented in state and faith-based care. The collaborative design will also be guided by the views of survivors and key communities, including Pacific peoples and disabled people."
Related media
Royal Commission Lake Alice report, Beehive Media Release, 15.12.2022
Abuse redress falls short, Waatea News, 14.12.2022
Rapid payments starting for historical abuse claimants, Beehive media release, 13.12.2022
Abuse in care inquiry: Victims distressed as wait for compensation drags on, RNZ, 07.12.2022
No break in sight for Abuse in Care Commission, Newsroom, 25.11.2022
Abuse survivors to help design redress, Waatea News, 24.11.2022
White Ribbon
The Aotearoa New Zealand White Ribbon 2022 campaign brings together resources and advice for parents, especially dads, to communicate with their children about issues like consent, healthy masculinity and respectful relationships. Events are happening around the country.
The campaign has also released new free online resources focused on flip the script to change phrases that promote unhealthy stereotypes. The resources include posters, graphics and a toolkit to flip the script around the phrase 'boys will be boys.' The toolkit introduces the 2022 campaign saying:
"The stereotypes and ideas from the past that are causing harm in our communities need to go. One of the leading predictors of violence towards women, is the belief in the rigid rules of masculinity. That means the more we tell our boys to harden up, don't cry and act like a man, the more we are promoting the kind of attitudes that support violence."
And it goes on to say:
"Let's take this outdated support for rigid masculinity and flip it on its head, because there are awesome things that boys can be that need to be celebrated. Boys can be kind, caring, and trustworthy. They can be allies, ethical, generous, humble, compassionate, supportive, respectful, thoughtful, multi-dimensional, considerate, gentle, and vulnerable. Boys have the potential to grow into great men that will not remain silent about violence."
Previously developed resources from the campaign include the following toolboxes:
- Kids and Gender Toolbox - for parents to support children who challenge gender norms
- Being Men Toolbox - understand and challenge stereotypes about what it is to be a man, and support healthy masculinity
- Call-in Toolbox - create meaningful change.
Advocate and researcher Michael Flood talks about some of these issues in his article ‘Toxic masculinity’: what does it mean, where did it come from – and is the term useful or harmful?.
International Day to End Violence Against Women and the 16 days of activism
Shine is offering a free webinar that looks at what causes family violence and gives an introduction to an intersectional approach to family violence. The webinar is scheduled for 30 November 2022, as part of the 16 days of activism. Register your interest or see Shine's Facebook for more details.
The 16 Days of Activism against Gender-Based Violence is an international campaign. It starts every year on 25 November, the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women, and runs until 10 December, Human Rights Day. The campaign was started by activists at the inaugural Women’s Global Leadership Institute in 1991. The US-based Center for Women’s Global Leadership continues to coordinate the global 16 days of activism campaign. For 2022, the theme is continuing from last year, focused on ending femicide.
The United Nations Secretary-General’s UNiTE by 2030 to End Violence against Women campaign aligns with the 16 Days of Activism. The UNiTE campaign is a multi-year effort aimed at preventing and eliminating violence against women and girls around the world. The UNiTE campaign's theme for this year is “UNITE! Activism to end violence against women and girls”. See the UNiTE 16 days of activism concept note.
Related Aotearoa NZ events and resources
The Shifting the Line research group is organising a seminar by Dr Stephen Burrell on Engaging men and boys in preventing violence against women in times of crisis: Lessons from the UK. The seminar will take place in Auckland on 24 November 2022. It will explore these issues, and consider how to effectively work with men and boys to develop more caring, connected relationships with others and themselves, in order to prevent different forms of violence – from gender-based violence to environmental harm. Dr Stephen Burrell is an Assistant Professor (Research) in the Department of Sociology at Durham University in the UK. He is also a Deputy Director of Durham’s Centre for Research into Violence and Abuse (CRiVA). Stephen is currently conducting a Leverhulme Early Career Fellowship about the links between masculinities, patriarchy, the climate crisis, and violence. Registration not required to attend.
Tom Johnson's paper, Bro Ora: revitalising tāne Māori wellbeing through an awa lens (2021), looks at tāne Māori and their wellbeing in the context of colonisation and the subsequent effects on tāne health and wellbeing. The paper also looks at the literature related to colonisation as a driving factor of the genderisation of tāne Māori and the impact on contemporary experiences of wellbeing for tāne Māori. It highlights existing gaps in research for tāne Māori wellness, and suggests using Iwi-specific methodologies to understand and capture the experiences of tāne Māori wellness. Watch a brief video of the author talking about the paper.
Researchers have used data from the Growing Up in New Zealand (GUiNZ) survey to see whether parents pass on gender attitudes and gender inequality to children. The researchers found that in most ways parents treat boy and girl children similarly in Aotearoa New Zealand, yet there were some differences. Those small differences could contribute to inequality between genders and children’s understanding of gender stereotypes, but the researchers conclude the small differences are not the main cause of gender inequality. They write in the report, Gendered parenting and the intergenerational transmission of gender stereotypes: evidence from the Growing Up in New Zealand survey (2022):
"Overall, the differences in parenting by the child’s sex are not large enough to explain the gender inequality between adults in Aotearoa New Zealand. We infer that external structural factors outside parents’ control likely play a primary role in perpetuating potentially harmful gender inequality. Parents alone cannot end the cycle of harmful gender inequalities, particularly since they are often pressured to parent within society’s gendered structural constrains."
Related international resources
The Working with Men and Boys for Social Justice Assessment Tool is a new tool developed to support leaders, designers and facilitators of programs for boys and men to evaluate the social and gender justice capacities of their program. The tool is based on research and practice in the areas of social justice, gender studies and the critical sociology of men and masculinities. The team developing and offering the tool includes Australian-based researchers Amanda Keddie, Michael Flood, Shelley Hewson-Munro, Maria Delaney, and Anna Halafoff. The team is hosting an online session on zoom to introduce the tool, how it can be used and what additional resources and work is available to support using the tool. The event is scheduled for 6 December 2022. Registration required.
Our Watch, based in Australia, published Men in focus practice guide: Addressing masculinities and working with men in the prevention of men’s violence against women (2022). The guide outlines the long-term, collective, and intersectional approach needed to dismantle and transform the norms, structures and practices that reinforce gender inequality and lead to men’s violence against women. It provides strategies to engage with men and boys about healthy masculinities. The guide builds on a review of evidence, Men in focus: unpacking masculinities and engaging men in the prevention of violence against women (2019). Our Watch has also published an online interactive Prevention toolkit for Australian local government (2022).
UNICEF shared a video highlighting global work addressing the intersection of gender transformative parenting programmes with violence against women and children. The video includes representatives talking about their work from the Prevention Collaborative, UNICEF and Equimundo (formerly Promundo).
Nurturing care and men's engagement (2022) is a thematic brief that summarises evidence about the benefits of men’s engagement in care on outcomes for women, children, and men. It has information about designing and adapting services to engage men in providing nurturing care. It also outlines practical actions for policymakers and programme designers across four environments: policies, services, communities and caregivers. Nurturing care is an initiative hosted by the World Health Organization, World Bank Group and UNICEF.
For more resources and research, search our library under the subject heading Engaging men and boys in violence prevention.
Related media
Projects pilot ways to help men talk about the tough stuff, RNZ, 11.01.2023
Overcoming ‘toxic masculinity’, Gisborne Herald, 14.12.2022
She Is Not Your Rehab - Documentary Release, Te Hiku Radio, 06.12.2022
Anti-violence campaign encourages healthy masculinity and relationships, PMN News, 28.11.2022
Gisborne community holds whānau days in first step to turn round violence, RNZ, 28.11.202
Supporting International Economic Harm Awareness Day, Shine media release, 25.11.2022
Free webinar to raise awareness about gender and family violence, Shine media release, 25.11.2022
Lesley Elliott leaves a legacy of caring, White Ribbon media release, 22.11.2022
Matt Brown interview on Pacific mornings, 531pi, 22.11.2022
White Ribbon Day in a week, RNZ, 18.11.2022
White Ribbon launches new resource to combat family violence, Stuff, 14.11.2022
Feeling lonely and the dangers of the internet, Classification Office Blog, 31.10.2022
Valuable New Tool For Workplaces To Assess Whether Domestic Violence Policies Are Best Practice, Press Release: Shine, 27.10.2022 (see the tool, Is your organisation DVFREE Ready?)
UN rapporteur call for inputs
*Update: The UN Special Rapporteur's final report, A/HRC/53/36: Custody, violence against women and violence against children, was published in April 2023.
The UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls, its causes and consequences has issued a call for inputs on custody cases, violence against women and violence against children.
The purpose is:
"To inform the Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls’ report on the nexus between custody and guardianship cases, violence against women and violence against children, with a focus on the abuse of the concept of “parental alienation” and related or similar concepts."
The closing date to submit is 15 December 2022.
The goal of the report is:
"...to examine the ways in which family courts in different world regions refer to parental alienation, or similar concepts, in custody cases and how this may lead to double victimisation of victims of domestic violence [and] abuse. It also aims to document the many ways in which family courts ignore the history and existence of domestic and family violence and abuse in the context of custody cases, as well as their grave consequences on mothers and their children."
The UN special rapporteur is inviting states, national human rights institutions, civil society actors, international organisations, academics, and other stakeholders to provide information. This includes non-government organisations and advocates.
Submissions are limited to 2000 words. There are 9 specific areas that feedback is invited on:
"1. The different manifestations or specific types of domestic and intimate partner violence experienced by women and children, including the use of “parental alienation” and related concepts in child custody and access cases. Please also include a description of the different forms of violence that may be experienced by the mother and child as well as fundamental human rights violations, where relevant.
2. The factors behind the increased number of allegations of parental alienation cases in custody battles and/or disputes involving allegations of domestic violence and abuse against women, and its differentiated impact on specific groups of women and children.
3. The way in which different groups of women and children experience this phenomenon differently based on any intersecting elements such as age, sex, gender, race, ethnicity, legal residence, religious or political belief or other considerations and the factors that contribute to these situations.
4. The role that professionals play, including welfare workers, child protection services, guardian ad-litem, psychologists, psychiatrists, and how they are regulated in any way as expert witnesses.
5. The consequences of the disregard for the history of domestic violence and abuse and intimate partner violence or the penalising of such allegations in custody cases on the human rights of both the mother and the child, and the interrelationship between these rights.
6. The challenges in collecting disaggregated data on courts’ practices concerning custody cases, the areas/sectors for which data is particularly lacking and the reasons for such challenges.
7. The good practices, strategies adopted by different organs of the State or other non-State actors, at local, national, regional, or international level to improve the due consideration of domestic and family violence, including intimate partner violence against women and abuse of children in determining child custody, as well as in providing remedies and redress for victims/survivors.
8. Recommendations for preventing the inadequate consideration of a history of domestic violence and abuse and gender stereotyping in custody cases to restore the human rights of mothers and their children, as well as ensure that survivors/victims are effectively protected and assisted.
9. Any other issue of relevance that are vital for consideration but that may not have been mentioned in this call for inputs."
Feedback can be submitted by email to hrc-sr-vaw@un.org.
Update: The UN Special Rapporteur issued a Statement on domestic violence and custody rights delivered to the European Parliament, 24 January 2023 saying "My mandate and other regional and international human rights mechanisms have found the lack of attention to partner and child violence in custody arrangements to be a feature in a number of jurisdictions in the EU, but also worldwide, hence the reason I am dedicating my next report to the Human Rights Council in June 2023 on this very issue. The report will also outline a number of recommendations."
Update: The Backbone Collective has published their submission to the call for inputs, New Zealand Family Court’s response to violence against women and children A submission from The Backbone Collective to the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women December 2022.
The Family Violence Death Review Committee has also published their submission Input for the report of the Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women and Girls on violence against women and children in custody cases (2022).
Background for the call for inputs
The call for inputs provides more detailed background, stating "...not enough attention is given to the interconnections between domestic violence and abuse and issues of child custody and parental relations."
It noted that a platform of independent expert mechanisms on the elimination of discrimination and violence against women issued a statement in 2019, Intimate partner violence against women is an essential factor in the determination of child custody. The statement raised concerns about patterns across jurisdictions globally that ignore women's experiences of intimate partner violence (IPV) in child custody cases. Since the statement was issued, the Special Rapporteur has received reports globally confirming these issues and further that mothers have been penalised for disclosing experiences of violence by law enforcement and/or the judiciary responsible for determining custody cases.
The Rapporteur highlights that family courts in several countries often dismiss a history of violence and abuse, as 'parental alienation.' She goes on to say:
"Although these concepts lack a universal clinical or scientific definition, emerging patterns across various jurisdictions of the world indicate courts worldwide are using the concept of “parental alienation” or similar concepts explicitly or are allowing for its instrumentalization. The vast majority of those accused of ‘alienating’ their child while alleging abuse are women. Consequently, many women victims of violence and abuse face double victimization as they are punished for alleging abuse, including by losing custody or at times being imprisoned. Children who are victims of violence and abuse by a parent (in many cases the father) often continue to be subjected to such violence and abuse, against themselves and/or the other parent (in most cases the mother) post-separation, through imposed contact with the abusive parent. These dynamics often allow parents to be intimidated, coerced or forced by their abusive ex-partners and pressured by the courts to withdraw their allegations of abuse or to agree to a specific custody arrangement. In many instances, when given the risk of losing contact with their children and the high impunity the violence committed by their partner, women end up withdrawing their allegations or not reporting at all. According to experts, in many cases, the perpetrators of violence have deliberately inflicted violence on their children as a continuation of the violence inflicted on their partner who is the parent of their children and therefore a continuation of the attempt and process of controlling the target (i.e. the mother)."
She further notes that the "regular and widespread dismissal of intimate partner violence history and incidents by family courts" can be a result of "harmful gender stereotypes and discriminatory gender bias among family law judges." And she further writes:
"A very powerful bias, shared by many welfare and judicial systems, is that the right of a father to maintain contact with his children should override any other consideration. This is often justified with reference to the “the best interest of the child”, so that it is argued that the child’s best interest is to maintain contact with their father under all circumstances, even if the father has been abusive towards the mother or the child."
The Rapporteur then details the international obligations under the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, and calls for action from the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women.
More information
For more information on the intersection of IPV and child care and protection in Aotearoa New Zealand see:
- Six reasons why we cannot be effective with either intimate partner violence or child abuse and neglect unless we address both together (2017), a position statement from the Family Violence Death Review Committee, drawing on their 5th report
- The Backbone Collective's report on New Zealand’s Sixth Periodic report to United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child 93rd Session (2022)
- Reports from the Backbone Collective including: Report Two - Out of the frying pan and into the fire: women's experiences of the New Zealand Family Court (2017) and Report Five - Seen And Not Heard: Children In The Family Court - Force (2017)
- NZFVC Issues Paper 4, Policy and practice implications: Child maltreatment, intimate partner violence and parenting (2013)
- NZFVC Issues Paper 3, Understanding connections and relationships: Child maltreatment, intimate partner violence and parenting (2013)
For more information about parental alienation see
- The journal article ‘It’s Not OK’, but ‘It’ never happened: parental alienation accusations undermine children’s safety in the New Zealand Family Court (2020) by Deborah Mackenzie, Ruth Herbert and Neville Robertson.
- The journal article The affective burden of separated mothers in PA(S) inflected custody law systems : a New Zealand case study (2020) by Vivienne Elizabeth.
- Video and resources from our 2018 seminar "Parental alienation” and family courts: A conversation on research and practice
- The Newsroom article from Catriona MacLennan on Family Court using discredited US theory (2017).
For more research and reports, search our library for parental alienation or search our library using the quick topic searches care and protection or custody/contact/access.
Related news
Manatū Wāhine | Ministry for Women is inviting expressions of interest from individuals, academics, and/or representatives of non-government organisations (NGO) to be the NGO delegate on the official New Zealand Government delegation to the 67th session of the Commission on the Status of Women. The Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) is the highest-level international forum on gender equality and women’s empowerment. CSW67 is being held from 6 to 17 March 2023 at the United Nations Headquarters in New York. The closing date to submit an expression of interest is 30 November 2022.
The UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women has released the list of issues and questions prior to the NZ Government's submission of the ninth periodic report of New Zealand. The Government's response to these issues and questions will form the 9th periodic report on New Zealand's implementation of CEDAW. This report is due to be submitted by the Government in July 2023. For more information see the Ministry for Women's information on CEDAW reporting.
Related media
Family Court judge rules child should visit killer father behind bars, NZ Herald, 27.04.2023
Family Court failings laid bare in research series, University of Auckland media release, 22.11.2022
Petition calls to end practice of child uplifts in custody battles, One News, 06.11.2022
Abuse victim Mrs P a step closer to appealing 'excoriating' court decision, Stuff, 31.10.2022
Inquiry urged into ‘parental alienation’ court experts, The Guardian [UK], 19.06.2022
Complaining about a Family Court judge isn't safe - advocate, RNZ, 01.09.2022
'They can't win': How an old idea about women puts children in danger, Stuff, 20.03.2021
Waipareira challenges parental alienation uplift, Waatea News, 27.01.2021
Call for proposals for national family violence conference
The Aotearoa New Zealand National Family Violence Conference, Hiwa-i-te-rangi, is being organised by Te Kupenga Whakaoti Mahi Patunga | the National Network of Family Violence Services. The conference organisers are inviting proposals from individuals and organisations who want to present at the conference in 2023.
Proposals to present must be submitted by 2 December 2022.
Proposals are invited on all aspects of work relating to family violence and/or sexual violence. This could include a diversity of methods and approaches, including performances, showcases, panels, discussion groups, workshops and academic papers.
Creative practitioners, activists, academics and researchers are invited to submit proposals to present. The presentation opportunity is for concurrent sessions during the conference. Depending on the number of presentations, presenters will have between 20-60 minutes to present.
The conference will take place at Te Wharewaka o Poneke in Te Whanganui a Tara | Wellington on Thursday 23 March and Friday 24 March 2023.
The conference whakatauki is
Waiho rā kia tū takitahi ana ngā whetū o te rangi
Let it be one alone that stands among the other stars in the sky
The call for proposals explains:
"Just as Hiwa-i-te-rangi, a Matariki star holds our dreams and desires in the hope they will be realised, Te Aorerekura, Aotearoa/New Zealand’s first National Strategy for the Elimination of Family Violence and Sexual Violence holds that space where our dreams and desires, indeed, our expectations, may be realised for better, more effective, and just, family and sexual violence prevention and response systems.
Our conference whakatauki Waiho rā kia tū takitahi ana ngā whetū o te rangi, reminds us however of the importance of stepping up as leaders in the space. The realisation of our aspirations, and those of our communities, requires that we each work as leaders in our mahi, alongside other leaders (in government, in culture, in communities) to realise Te Aorerekura’s Moemoea that “All people in Aotearoa New Zealand are thriving; their wellbeing is enhanced and sustained because they are safe and supported to live their lives free from family violence and sexual violence”.
While Hiwa-i-te-rangi invites us to dream, Te Aorerekura implores us to action."
Proposals need to include details about your topics, presenters and more. For more information see the call for proposals which has guidelines for submitting a proposal and examples of possible topics.
For questions, contact the conference organiser Howard Dawson at conference@nnsvs.org.nz.
For more information about the event, see the official conference website: www.familyviolenceconference.nz.
NZFVC webinar
The NZ Family Violence Clearinghouse is hosting a webinar on the Rights and needs of migrant victim-survivors of family violence within immigration policies and practices on Monday, 28 November 2022 from 11:30am to 1:00pm.
Research and feedback from victim-survivors and advocates has shown that immigration policies and practices can create barriers for migrant victims of family violence when accessing help.
The webinar will look at:
- The current situation for migrant victim-survivors of family violence in Aotearoa New Zealand in relation to immigration policies
- Policies from other countries and Aotearoa New Zealand’s international obligations under the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
- What policy, practice and support changes are needed.
The webinar will feature 5 panellists including:
- Vasudha Gautam, the Client Care Coordinator of the Refugee and Immigration Legal Advice Service at Community Law Wellington and Hutt Valley, and a victim-survivor
- Silvana Erenchun Perez, the Strategic Manager of Shama Ethnic Women’s Trust
- Sarah Croskery-Hewitt lawyer and legal researcher, focused on access to justice issues facing survivors of family and sexual violence including research on the intersection of immigration law and family violence in Aotearoa New Zealand
- Dhilum Nightingale, community lawyer who works with migrant survivors of domestic violence with visa applications and appeals to the Immigration & Protection Tribunal
- Megan Williams, law reform advocate at Community Law Centres o Aotearoa, working in the areas of immigration and refugee law, social welfare and housing law, family violence and access to justice
See more information about the panellists and register to attend. A video recording of the webinar and transcript will be made available on our website.
Background and related news
Green Party MP Jan Logie has proposed a member’s bill, Protecting Migrant Victims of Family Violence Bill, to provide stronger protections for people in migrant communities who experience family violence. The bill aims to prioritise children’s needs, remove barriers to help-seeking for recent migrants, and recognise and remove opportunities for immigration law-related abuse and coercion as a dynamic of family violence. The draft bill is available online. In announcing the bill, Jan Logie said:
“Everyone has the right to a life free from violence, regardless of their immigration status. However for migrants coming to Aotearoa New Zealand with their partners, New Zealand’s current immigration settings can trap them in some very dangerous situations.
“Under the current rules, migrant victims of family violence in a relationship with a citizen or permanent resident have access to two special visa categories. They can either be granted a Family Violence Work Visa for six months or, in some specific circumstances, a Family Violence Resident Visa.
“However, the criteria for both is so narrow and the burden of proof so high that many survivors are not eligible, and are forced to remain in a violent relationship in order to stay in the country/with their children.
“Immigration Ministers past and present have known about this for years, particularly following the findings of a 2019 report by Immigration New Zealand - and yet nothing has been done to change it, including in the big immigration reset the Government announced a few months ago.
“My Bill would provide a long overdue pathway for migrants who are trapped in violent relationships. It will put the needs of children at the heart of the system and make it easier for migrant victims to apply for, and be issued with, a family violence visa."
The bill has not yet been pulled from the biscuit tin and does not yet have enough support to be introduced in Parliament without being selected through the ballot.
Te Mahere Whai Mahi Wāhine | the Women’s Employment Action Plan includes an action to "Review the immigration settings for migrants in New Zealand who experience family violence to ensure that appropriate support is available, including visa categories that are more commonly granted to women" by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE), Manatū Wāhine | Ministry for Women, and the Ministry for Ethnic Communities.
Media outlet Newsroom reported that a review of partnership-based visa settings, including the Victims of Family Violence Work visa, is planned for 2023. Newsroom has also highlighted that changes coming in December 2022 to work visas for partners of temporary migrants could increase the risks for victims of family violence.
The parliamentary select Education and Workforce Committee completed an inquiry into migrant exploitation. In the final report from the inquiry, the Committee noted that feedback they heard from submitters included:
"Restricting work rights for partners of work visa holders may have negative outcomes. We heard repeatedly from submitters that migrants do not report exploitation because they fear deportation or other changes to their visa status. Similarly, some migrants may not report family violence because their immigration status is tied to an abusive partner. If partners of work visa holders cannot work, and are financially dependent on an abusive partner, they are even less likely to report abuse. They may also be incentivised to work illegally, which puts them at greater risk of exploitation." (page 25)
The Committee also stated "We believe that Victims of Family Violence visas should be available to all migrants who are experiencing abuse, not just those migrants who are the partner of a New Zealand citizen or residence class visa holder." The Committee made 3 related recommendations:
"We recommend that the Government closely monitor instances of family violence in migrant families and consider whether immigration settings should be changed to prevent violence.
We recommend that the Government prioritise work to make sure that migrant partners and families are suitably supported by the immigration system after situations of family violence.
We recommend that the Government consider the eligibility criteria for the Victims of Family Violence Visa to enable more migrants to access it. " (page 27)
A previous MBIE report identified "policy issues and INZ operational/processing issues" that present barriers to migrant victims obtaining family violence visas. Ethnic, migrant and former refugee communities identified these and other issues during the engagement to develop Te Aorerekura. Their feedback and recommendations are summarised in the community analysis paper Analysis: Ethnic, migrant and former refugee communities: engagement for Te Aorerekura.
The UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women has previously raised concerns about the impacts of immigration settings on migrant victims of family violence in Aotearoa New Zealand. In their Concluding Observations on New Zealand's 8th periodic report (CEDAW/C/NZL/CO/8), the Committee highlighted: that migrant women with children might be "...returned to their country of origin, leaving their children behind with fathers, even in cases where there is known or reported abuse", that migrant women might remain in abusive relationships because their visa status was dependent on their partner and that women in these situations have barriers to access to justice including no access to legal aid. The Committee recommended the government:
"(a) Revise its immigration laws, with a view to facilitating access to permanent residency permits for mothers of children who hold New Zealand nationality;
(b) Ensure the availability of shelters for migrant women who are victims of violence, including domestic violence, and provide them with free legal and psychological counselling, rehabilitation and other support services;
(c) Create adequate conditions for women migrants to lodge complaints, including by ensuring that they are properly informed of their rights, and available remedies, including how to lodge complaints of violations of those rights, including in a language that they can understand."
For more information
For more information about violence against women from ethnic and migrant communities, see:
Intersections of immigration law and family violence: exploring barriers for ethnic migrant and refugee background women (2021), by Irene Ayallo
NZFVC Issues Paper Ethnic perspectives on family violence in Aotearoa New Zealand (2019) by Rachel Simon-Kumar
Episode 5: Shakti of the Breaking Silence documentary series, produced by Magnetic Pictures for Stuff with the support of NZ On Air and published on RNZ
For related research and information see the Migrants, Refugees and Asian peoples quick topic searches in our NZFVC library.
Related news
Adhikaar Aotearoa has published the report, Community is where the knowledge is: the Adhikaar report (2022), sharing findings from a community consultation about the unique experiences that LGBT+ South Asians face in Aotearoa New Zealand. The report shares the stories from the community and speaks to experiences through three themes: self and society, ethnic families and communities, and mainstream LGBT+ communities. Adhikaar Aotearoa is a Aotearoa-based charity that provides education, advocacy and support towards their vision of "An Aotearoa where LGBTQIA+ people of colour, particularly South Asians, can be themselves, free of fear and stigma, and explore their potential while challenging discrimination against them." Sandra Dickson from Takatāpui and Rainbow organisation Hohou Te Rongo Kahukura wrote A reflection on The Adhikaar Report.
Related media
Wood postpones partner work visa changes until Easter, Newsroom, 05.12.2022
Changes to partner work visas deferred to April 2023, Beehive media release, 05.12.2022
'Doubling administration': Experts warn over work rights for migrants' partners, RNZ, 29.11.2022
Racism and violence experienced by South Asian LGBTQIA+ New Zealanders, Stuff, 02.11.2022
Violence ignored in immigration changes, Newsroom, 31.08.2022
Man who held machete to wife's neck escapes deportation, Stuff, 31.08.2022
$1000 infringement fees just ‘loose change’ to exploitative employers, Newroom, 25.08.2022
New panel sees refugees advise on refugees, Newroom, 27.07.2022
Govt announcements
Social Sector Commissioning Action Plan launched
Minister for Social Development and Employment Carmel Sepuloni announced the launch of the Social Sector Commissioning Action Plan 2022-2028. A brief, executive summary for the action plan is also available.
The purpose of the Action Plan is "Transforming the way social supports and services are commissioned so that they best support people, families and whānau to live the lives they value." This change involves giving practical effect to Te Tiriti o Waitangi and moving towards a relational approach.
The plan outlines 9 main actions that will be implemented over 3 different phases from 2022-2028:
- Learn how a relational approach can be applied to commissioning
- Provide the social sector with guidance on how to work in a relational way
- Change the commissioning system’s rules and processes to enable the sector to work together to provide social services
- Support reform programmes to work smarter and in a joined-up way to implement relational approaches to commissioning
- Government agencies and Crown entities make operational changes to deliver the government-endorsed ‘commitments’ to commissioning practice (there are 15 commitments listed in the plan)
- Government agencies and Crown entities outline the actions and approach they will take to implement a relational approach to commissioning
- Create a stewardship group that represents people who are involved in or impacted by the social sector, so they guide, promote, and protect the transformation of the system
- Build a team that is responsible for implementing the 2022–2028 Social Sector Commissioning Action Plan
- Monitor and learn how social sector commissioning is impacting individuals, families and whānau
The plan also identifies that a Commissioning Hub will be set up, noting "The Social Sector Commissioning work programme will have a team, known as the Commissioning Hub, that will provide support and guidance, and will facilitate change to a relational approach to commissioning." In addition, the plan identifies that working groups and a stewardship group will be set up.
In announcing the plan, Minister Sepuloni said:
“For our social services, these changes mean they can be sustainable, less focused on paper work and competition for funding, and more focused on supporting their communities with more flexibility in responding to the unique and diverse needs of those accessing their services.
“And for government, it means we need to be transparent in how we commission and support social services, and work collaboratively to learn and grow in order to meet the needs of New Zealanders. It’s also about making sure our investment in the sector is going to the right people and places, as opposed to being tied up in administrative processes."
For more information see the Ministry of Social Development (MSD) information on Social Sector Commissioning Action Plan and reform and the related Social Sector Commissioning: Direction for Change cabinet papers. The Commissioning Hub was included in Budget 2022. Also see the related MSD Budget 2022 fact sheet on Social Sector Commissioning: Growing the Capability of the Social Sector.
Related news
The Auckland Co-design Lab and The Southern Initiative in collaboration with Te Puna Aonui (formerly the Joint Venture on Family Violence and Sexual Violence) published the report Activating an Ecology of Support: a Futures Visualisation Project to inform integrated community-led responses to family violence and sexual violence (2022). The report was "...developed to inform thinking and ongoing discussion about what integrated community-led responses, as a 'new approach to investment' in family violence and sexual violence, could look like."
Community Networks Aotearoa |Te Hapori Tuhononga o Aotearoa has started an initiative to improve experiences with banks for community organisations. The project is looking at how banks and changes to banking systems are affecting the work of community organisations. They have formed a collaborative working group with four of their member organisations and they are working with the Citizens Advice Bureau and FINZ (the Fundraising Institute of New Zealand). Currently they are seeking feedback on whether organisations or community members have experienced banking difficulties.
Update: Community Networks Aotearoa published the final report from this research in June 2023: Better Banking for All -Creating Ease of Banking for the Not-For-Profit Sector (2023).
Hui E! Community Aotearoa published a Community Funding White Paper | Pepa Mā mō te Whai Pūtea ā-Hapori (2022). The white paper sets out 6 recommendations for government and other funders. The paper reflects on the strengths of the community sector in response to long term funding challenges as well as challenges and impacts from COVID-19.
SociaLink published a brief on the Impact of inflation on community organisations and communities (2022). The brief includes findings from a survey of community organisations and a review of recent literature on inflation. SociaLink is the umbrella organisation for the Western Bay of Plenty social agencies. The report includes suggestions for government and other funders, as well as community organisations.
Pay equity settlement for community social workers
Update: On 24 November 2022, Minister for Women Jan Tinetti announced that the Government will extend pay equity to all community and iwi organisations who employ social workers and receive funding from the Crown. This is expected to benefit 4,600 social workers. Minister Tinetti said:
“It will also streamline the process by removing the requirement for providers to work through their own separate pay equity claim.
“This agreement from Government means that officials from the pay equity taskforce at Te Kawa Mataaho will immediately begin a significant piece of work to identify all the relevant providers in the sector and identify how many social workers they have that are covered by this extension.
“It follows work in October, when we announced a pay equity settlement for almost 500 social workers employed in five community and iwi organisations. They join the over 105,000 other working people who, since 2017, have now received a pay correction as a result of a pay equity claim.
“The extension is the first under the Framework for Oversight and Support of pay equity claims in the funded sector and will represent real and significant change for our valuable and hardworking community social workers.
“I encourage the community sector to engage with this upcoming piece of work as your voices will be critical in ensuring all providers and working people are captured to deliver pay equity for all."
For more information about next steps see the update from Te Kawa Mataaho | Public Service Commission. Also see the joint media release from PSA and SSPA.
Cabinet has agreed to a settlement for a pay equity claim related to 5 representative iwi and community social service organisations. The pay equity settlement and funding addresses pay undervaluation for community 'workers performing social work' at Barnardos, Christchurch Methodist Mission, Ngāpuhi Iwi Social Services, Stand Tū Māia and Wellington Sexual Abuse Help.
The claim was lodged in August 2019 by the Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi (PSA) following the 2018 settlement of the Oranga Tamariki pay equity claim. PSA said the settlement would mean that almost 500 social workers across the 5 organisations would receive an average pay rise of 36%. PSA also said "It will go a long way to retaining social workers in this critical sector. We now call on the Government to extend this settlement to the rest of the NGO sector so more workers can be paid fairly."
Minister for Children Kelvin Davis said “This social work pay equity claim is an important first step towards addressing the significant gender pay gap for social workers and others who carry out substantially similar work.”
Social Service Providers Aotearoa (SSPA) has coordinated and represented the organisations since the claim was lodged. Brenda Pilott ONZM, SSPA’s Pay Equity Co-Ordinator, said:
"The PSA lodged this pay equity claim against the five employers over three years ago – so we are tremendously pleased that a settlement has finally been reached. We acknowledge the immense commitment, and the workload carried by the five representative employers, in particular their CEOs, and members of their teams who have contributed significant time and effort to work assessments and data/information gathering that have informed the claim. We also acknowledge the ongoing support of the wider SSPA membership, the open and cooperative process with the PSA, and with Oranga Tamariki as the lead funding agency."
The SSPA media release noted that a plan and process are underway to extend the benefits of the settlement to the wider sector and that Te Kawa Mataaho | the Public Service Commission is leading the work. The SSPA media release also noted that PSA has filed a separate claim covering other workers at social service agencies who are not covered under the current settlement which is specific to 'workers performing social work.'
SSPA Chief Executive Dr Claire Achmad said:
"...the ball can start rolling on that second claim now, with this first claim having reached settlement. We expect this to be another complex and time-consuming claim due to the wide range of social services roles potentially covered, and we will be working hard to achieve a good outcome. As with the social work claim, we would expect to see the representative claim extended to others in the social services sector. It is only right that those kaimahi walking alongside families and whānau are appropriately valued and paid for the hard and tireless work that they do every day, too.”
For more background information about the settled claim as well as future work in this area see the SSPA updates on pay equity including a summary of the settlement. You can also sign-up for the SSPA pay equity mailing list.
Related news
Kāhui Whakamana Tauwhiro | the Social Workers Registration Board published the report Demand for Social Workers: An insight into the number of vacant social work positions across Aotearoa (2022).
The Fair Pay Agreements Bill has passed Parliament and received Royal Assent. The legislation will provide a framework for collective bargaining for fair pay agreements across entire industries or occupations, rather than just between unions and particular employers. Media outlet The Spinoff provides an overview Fair Pay Agreements herald a new dawn for workers – but what exactly are they? article. The Beehive media release notes that more guidance for employees and employers will be available after 1 December when the Fair Pay Agreements system comes into effect. For more information see the Fair Pay Agreements information from the Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment.
Update: Legislation to repeal the Fair Pay Agreements Act passed its third reading in December 2023. See the Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment website for more information.
Between August 2021 and July 2022, the Human Rights Commission led a national inquiry into the Pacific Pay Gap to better understand why the pay gap exists and how it can be closed. The report, Voices of Pacific peoples: Eliminating pay gaps (2022), shares the findings and recommendations from the inquiry.
Related news
The Government has launched Te Korowai Whetū Social Cohesion strategic framework and community fund. The strategic framework outlines actions and outcomes to achieve a central vision of social cohesion in Aotearoa New Zealand. Resources are also available including information sheets, a summary of feedback, a baseline report and a measurement framework. Advocate Anjum Rahman has written article calling for the social cohesion framework to be applied to government first.
Minister for Diversity, Inclusion and Ethnic Communities, Priyanca Radhakrishnan said “It is important that we have a shared understanding of what social cohesion is and take actions we know can strengthen it." Minister Radhakrishnan also announced a $2 million community fund to support local and community-based social cohesion initiatives. Te Korowai Whetū Social Cohesion community fund is being administered by the Ministry of Social Development.
For more information see the cabinet papers related to strengthening social cohesion in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Related media
Care Workers Call For Fairness On Pay Equity Anniversary, Press Release: E Tū, Scoop, 18.04.2024
Government moves to support social workers workforce, Beehive media release, 10.05.2023
Pay equity deal to extend to community and iwi social workers - Minister, RNZ, 24.11.2022
Pay equity deal extended to all community social workers, One News, 24.11.2022
Recapturing a national sense of belonging, Newsroom, 10.11.2022
The 50th birthday of the Equal Pay Act is no cause for celebration, Newsroom, 19.10.2022
International resources on self-care and collective care
Dare to Care is a free self-paced online course designed for researchers, practitioners and others working to prevent and address violence against women and children. The course can be completed as an individual or as part of a group or with a support partner. The course was designed by the Sexual Violence Research Initiative (SVRI). SVRI is an international network on research on violence against women and violence against children, based in South Africa.
The course has 4 modules based on a metaphor of the rain forest:
- Settling into the forest floor: How to prepare and create a safe and supportive space to complete the course
- Exploring the understory: Build a shared understanding of key concepts such as burnout, vicarious trauma and stress, including what stress means in your own context, how stress can be intersectional and what collective stress looks like
- Tending to the canopy: Explore the concept of collective care, what it offers that self-care practices cannot and analyse the factors that enable and undermine collective care in the contexts of your work
- Flourishing at the emergent layer: Develop a collective care growth plan and identify your own role in collective care and prepare to take action.
The online course includes short videos with transcripts, reflective practices for individuals or groups, and meditation. It comes with a downloadable Guide and Reflection Journal, as well as guidance on how to go through the course safely as an individual or group.
The course is part of the We Care Project from SVRI on Institutionalising Accessible Staff Wellness and Resilience Policies, Tools and Practices for the GBV [gender-based violence] Field. Additional resources from the project include:
- Video recordings of webinars on Decolonising Wellness and Self-Care and Leadership, self and collective care
- A case study on creating and maintaining a culture of self and collective care at an organisation that addresses violence
- A case study on promoting wellbeing through self and collective care for staff on a research project
- An Evidence Review that explores research into how wellness and care can be institutionalised in the violence against women field.
The SVRI work highlights the opportunities and responsibility for organisations to support the wellbeing of staff and volunteers, taking into account the wider factors that affect access to wellbeing. In the SVRI blog post From Me to We: reclaiming the need for collective care (2021), the authors write:
"We are not the first group to critique dominant approaches to self-care, resilience, and wellness – largely rooted in western paradigms – which place the burden of care and coping on individuals, often in their personal capacity. The individualised focus does not acknowledge that our work spaces and work cultures themselves may be contributing to our stress and trauma nor does it highlight the role that institutions and organisations must play in preventing burnout, and promoting and nurturing wellness, care, and kindness."
Making Cents International has published the guide How to embed self- and collective care within organizations addressing gender-based violence (2022). The guide is available in English, عربى , Français and Español. The guide outlines 3 pillars to guide organisations when implementing self- and collective care:
- Values, organisational culture, and leadership
- Policies and structures
- Contextualised practices.
For each pillar, it outlines what is involved, potential barriers, needed resources and practical suggestions. The guide highlights that:
"Putting self- and collective care into practice requires courage, intentionality, resources, and a willingness to imagine a different kind of organization. Funders can play a critical role in validating and supporting this process."
Womankind Worldwide, a UK-based global women's rights organisation, published Nurturing the beating heart of feminist movements: Lessons drawn from Womankind Worldwide’s Movement Strengthening Fund (2022). The report shares lessons from nine initiatives on how to strengthen feminist organising. The lessons address wellbeing, continuous learning, building a solid movement infrastructure, leadership strengthening and ensuring diversity and inclusion. The report has recommendations, including this recommendation for funders:
"Promote self and collective care: Feminist movements need funding to ensure their work does not fragment them and they have the ability to withstand processes of rusting and erosion. They need to engage with strategies focusing on holistic development with an emphasis on intellectual, psychological, physical and spiritual stimulation and wellbeing. All this emphasises the very real need to look after themselves, ‘time out’ to nurture and look at one’s sources of inspiration."
Another SVRI blog post explored Self-Care: What’s Power Got to do With It? (2022), writing:
"Many organisations have made efforts to support their staff during enormously challenging times and given thought to how to prioritise and encourage self-care both at and outside of work. However, this commitment to inclusive approaches to care is far from the norm, even within our field, and we wanted to reflect on whose voices are included and who has limited or no access to meaningful practices around self and collective care: how do power and privilege impact on concepts of and access to self and collective care within organisations?"
The article, Self-care for gender-based violence researchers – Beyond bubble baths and chocolate pralines (2022), explores relational and collaborative ways of self-care and caring for each other for gender-based violence researchers, especially when there is lack of institutional awareness and support.
The article, The better to break and bleed with: research, violence, and trauma (2021), is one researcher's reflections on experiencing emotion and trauma in social science research, in relation to studying violence, and explores "how a trauma-informed ethics of care, grounded in a collective process of seeking and finding guidance and support, might look."
Researchers who reviewed studies of interventions to address vicarious trauma for service providers working with traumatised clients found that most interventions were self-care based and often focused on general stress management rather than addressing the specific effects of vicarious trauma. While the interventions generally showed positive benefits, researchers call for interventions tailored to address vicarious trauma for different service settings and participant characteristics. For more information see the article A scoping review of vicarious trauma interventions for service providers working with people who have experienced traumatic events (2021).
See our related news stories below for additional resources related to wellbeing and collective care.
Update: Safe and Equal, based in Australia, has created resources to support wellbeing for people who work in primary prevention of family violence. The 'How We Thrive' Video Series (2023) includes 4 brief videos and tip sheets. These resources are designed to help managers and organisational leaders understand what prevention practitioners need to feel supported and valued in their organisations, as well as helping prevention practitioners to advocate for their own projects and wellbeing.
Update: The report How Can We Ground Ourselves in Care and Dance Our Revolution? (2023) explore actions to prioritise collective care to mitigate risks and promote the wellbeing and sustainability of feminist movements. It draws on interviews with 141 activists in 63 countries speaking on how they integrate care into their activism and work. In announcing their report, Urgent Action Funds consortium said:
"The report also calls on funders to provide more resources to fund collective care practices among feminist movements, directly providing recommendations, and next steps from activists on the frontlines. The perspectives shared in our report offer a unique and diverse understanding of collective care, highlighting the experiences of women, trans, and non-binary feminist activists who have been historically marginalized within social justice movements worldwide.
We’ve asked those who compiled the research to provide a deeper understanding of the importance of collective care in the feminist space."
Update: In the Collective Care and Kindness (2023, SE212) podcast, SVRI explores the concept of collective care - the practice of taking responsibility for the wellbeing of each other, as individuals and as a community. It looks at the dangers faced by women and children globally in the sphere of activism, and how collective care can support and heal those who are vulnerable to attacks. It also looks at the importance of integrating collective care into our organisations and what this can look like.
Update: UK-reseacher Malaka Shwaikh explores the limits of resilience by drawing on hundreds of interviews with global survivors of wars and violence in the article Beyond Expectations of Resilience: Towards a Language of Care (2023).
Related news
InsideOUT Kōaro and researchers from the University of Otago documented the development of a culture of care to support the wellbeing of Rainbow activists involved with InsideOUT Kōaro in the article Creating a culture of care to support rainbow activists’ well-being: an exemplar from Aotearoa | New Zealand (2022).
Housing First Auckland shared a video recording of a presentation on Maramataka - a deeper connection to te ao Māori to support self-care (2022) from Ayla Hoeta and Vikki ham. The presentation slides and a downloadable Maramataka Dial are also available.
Advocates and researchers have continued to document the impacts of the COVID pandemic on advocates and organisations working in gender-based violence. Some of the recent resources include:
- Video recording of the webinar on Helping from home: Domestic and family violence worker wellbeing during the ‘shadow pandemic (2022) from the Monash Gender and Family Violence Prevention Centre [Australia]
- The articles The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Staff in Violence Against Women Services (2022) and “There's no amount of tea in the world that is going to fix the patriarchy right now”: The gendered impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic for women in the gender-based violence sector (2022) share findings from interviews and focus groups with staff about their experiences during the pandemic in Canada
Find more research and resources related to COVID-19 and violence in our library under the quick topic search on COVID-19.
Related media
The Waikato kaimahi kapa haka competition is connecting to a tool for healing, NZ Herald, 27.10.2023
Mātauranga on app for mental health mindfulness, Waatea News, 11.10.2022
Changes to national mortality review committees
The Health Quality & Safety Commission (HQSC) announced significant changes to the mortality review committees following an independent review. HQSC announced that a single national mortality review committee would be established next year to carry out the national mortality review function.
It also stated that the current mortality review committees would continue for now as expert groups, under the oversight of the new single National Mortality Review Committee.
Currently, there are five mortality review committees:
- Family Violence Death Review Committee (FVDRC)
- Perioperative Mortality Review Committee
- Perinatal & Maternal Mortality Review Committee
- Suicide Mortality Review Committee
- Child & Youth Mortality Review Committee.
HQSC has provided initial details about the planned changes, noting:
- a single National Mortality Review Committee will be established
- current mortality review committee members will be invited to become 'subject matter and representative experts' within the overall national mortality review function (NMRF)
- all current secretariat staff will transition to form part of the NMRF business unit
- data will be brought together under the NMRF
- statutory powers under Schedule 5 of the Pae Ora (Healthy Futures) Act 2022 will be transferred from the committees to the National Mortality Review Committee
- the single National Mortality Review Committee will be able to focus on 'current and emerging priority areas, informed by an all-mortality prioritisation process.'
HQSC outlined next steps:
"An interim National Mortality Review Committee will be stood up in early 2023 to provide expertise in the development of these core frameworks and identify emerging areas of mortality review.
The NMRF will continue to uphold key functions and activities of the existing MRCs, with a dual focus on reporting key mortality trends as well as assessing and prioritising areas of greatest need.
The interim National Mortality Review Committee and the Commission will work closely with the existing MRCs to transition institutional knowledge, and to ensure current members are well positioned to continue to provide an important voice as subject matter and representative experts.
Mortality review workstreams across child and youth, perinatal and maternal, and suicide will continue in the 2023/24 financial year under the transformed NMRF. A national expert group will continue to provide oversight and advice on national trends in perioperative deaths. Family violence death review will remain in place for the long term." [emphasis added]
In the media release, HQSC board chair Dr Dale Bramley said
"All current committees will continue to exist until 30 June 2023, throughout the transition to the refreshed model, and members will be invited to become subject matter and representative experts within these priority workstreams of the National Mortality Review Committee. I can assure current committee members that their areas of focus will continue to be a priority throughout the transition."
Dr Bramley also said "One of the main reasons for the transformation is to address inequities in Māori mortality rates."
The changes are based on an independent review of the national mortality review function completed by Francis Health in April 2022.
The Final report: Review of the national mortality review function (March 2022) summarises the review findings and recommendations. The report highlighted "the vital importance and value of a mortality review function" but also highlighted areas to improve function and impact. Key areas of change included Te Tiriti compliance, expansion of scope, and increased attention on cross-sector engagement, among others.
Update: Two appendices from the final review report are available: Appendix A: Current state critical review and Appendix B: Literature review.
Further details are not yet available about what the changes will mean for the function, statutory powers, and committee members of the Family Violence Death Review Committee.
For questions about the independent review or the new National Mortality Review Function email: mrcsecretariat@hqsc.govt.nz.
Update: The changes to the national mortality review function came into effect on 1 July 2023. Details about the new National Mortality Review Committee, committee member bios, and subject matter experts are available on the Te Tāhū Hauora Health | Quality & Safety Commission website. Fiona Cram, current chair of the Family Violence Death Review Committee and Ngā Pou Arawhenua (Māori caucus of the current mortality review committees), is one of 8 members on the new National Committee. There are 5 initial workstreams for the new National Mortality Review Committee - this includes a Family violence death review workstream to build on the work of the previous Family Violence Death Review Committee.
Background on the Family Violence Death Review Committee
The Family Violence Death Review Committee (FVDRC) was established in 2008 as an interagency, multi-disciplinary committee to systematically review all family violence deaths, as an initiative launched by the Taskforce for Action on Violence within Families.
In 2010, the Health Quality & Safety Commission was set up as a Crown entity and took responsibility for national mortality review committees, including the FVDRC. The FVDRC became a statutory committee under Section 59E of the amended New Zealand Public Health and Disability Act in April 2011. Currently, the FVDRC reports to the Health Quality & Safety Commission Board, and through the Board, to the Associate Minister of Health.
The final report from the review of the national mortality review function highlighted that:
"The methodology and review model developed and applied by the current FVDRC provides a benchmark for taking a holistic and whole of system approach. This model takes a life course approach and allows an intensive and multi sectoral review which yields insights with broad applicability and relevance."
The report also highlighted that "the FVDRC is the only MRC [mortality review committee] which has been able to build a critical mass of Māori expertise."
See the article, Getting the Story Right: Reflecting on an Indigenous Rubric to Guide the Interpretation of Mortality Data, for information about how the FVDRC addresses tikanga-based principles in their reviews and reports.
The FVDRC's seventh report, A duty to care | Me manaaki te tangata, has more information about the FVDRC and how the committee functions.
Update: Also see the recently published article Te Pou: An Indigenous Framework to Evaluate the Inclusion of Family Voice in Family Violence Homicide Reviews (2022). The article evaluates the inclusion of family and whānau voice in the indepth review process of the Family Violence Death Review Committee in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Also see the HQSC website for information on the Family Violence Death Review Committee.
Related media
Mortality review shake-up allows Māori focus, Waatea News, 03.07.2023
No results found.
Please try different keywords or filter options.
Subscribe to our Pānui and our News and Events mailing lists
Never miss an update! Receive the latest news and event information directly to your inbox.