He pitopito kōrero
News
News stories
White Ribbon New Zealand is organising a spoken word competition for rangatahi (young people), with the theme of respectful relationships. It will explore young people's take on ending men’s violence in Aotearoa New Zealand.
White Ribbon NZ promotes respectful relationships to prevent men’s violence against women.
Performers must be students at a NZ secondary school (or equivalent) and 15 years or older. Poems must be the original work of the performer. Young people can perform individually or as a team. Poems are to be between 1-4 minutes (5 minutes maximum).
The deadline to apply to participate is 16 September 2019. Entry forms will be available on the White Ribbon website.
The Spoken Word competition will be held on 26 September 2019 at Wellington College.
For more information see the White Ribbon webpage on the spoken word competition.
Also see the 2016 White Ribbon New Zealand campaign that focused on respectful relationships.
The competition is part of White Ribbon’s Youth Ambassador Leadership Programme.
The White Ribbon movement works to eliminate men’s violence against women by encouraging men to take ownership of the issue and model positive behaviour to change attitudes and behaviour.
Update: Winners from the competition have been announced.
Related news
E Tū Whānau is currently accepting entries for their 2019 annual song competition. The song competition highlights songs that inspire positive change and incorporate one or more of the six E Tū Whānau values. E Tū Whānau is a movement for positive change in response to unacceptable levels of violence in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Earlier in 2019, Le Va launched a new e-learning module on respectful relationships for Pasifika young people as part of the Atu-Mai programme. Atu-Mai is a national violence prevention programme for Pasifika young people launched in 2018. A webinar on Atu-Mai held on 15 August 2019 is now available to view online. This was hosted by TOAH-NNEST.
The District Court has released the evaluation report for the sexual violence court pilot in Auckland and Whangārei.
The findings from the evaluation confirm a number of successful outcomes, including shorter wait times for cases to go to trial and reduced trauma to complainants (victims/survivors).
Key findings from the evaluation are outlined in a media release by Acting Chief District Court Judge John Walker:
- "Pilot cases progress more efficiently, faster and with fewer delays overall;
- Stakeholders perceive that trial quality has improved, with fewer adjournments and better quality evidence;
- Complainants are generally better prepared for attending trial, reducing anxiety;
- Judges are more alert to unacceptable questioning and intervene more frequently;
- Judges are more actively involved with cases from an earlier stage, and case review hearings are considerably more thorough and comprehensive;
- Giving defendants firm trial dates earlier is resulting in more and earlier guilty pleas;
- Dedicated case managers are critical to success; and
- There is unanimous support among stakeholders to roll the pilot model out nationally."
The full report, Sexual Violence Court Pilot Evaluation Report (2019), explores the impacts of the pilot in several areas, including preparing and starting the pilot, case management, trial management and wider impacts of the pilot.
HELP Auckland provided independent victim advocacy services in half of the pilot cases observed by Sexual Violence Victim Advisors. SVVAs felt that the pilot (and indeed all sexual violence cases) should be sufficiently funded to allow each complainant witness to be assigned both an SVVA and a victim advocate (page 46).
The Chief District Court Judge established the pilot with the support of the Ministry of Justice in December 2016. The evaluation covered the first two years of the pilot.
The report also discusses learnings from the pilot and reflects on rolling out the pilot nationwide. One of the key findings in this area was "... unanimous support for the pilot model to be rolled out nationally" (page 99).
A fact sheet published by the District Court states "The pilot will now become permanent in Whāngārei and Auckland but any rollout to other centres depends on resourcing decisions beyond judicial control."
In a recently announced package of reforms to improve the justice response for victims of sexual violence, Parliamentary Under-Secretary to the Minister of Justice Jan Logie recommended waiting to make a decision on national rollout of the pilot until after the evaluation of the pilot was completed.
The report was prepared by Gravitas Research and Strategy, an independent consultancy. Gravitas held interviews with complainants and interviews and focus groups with stakeholders. The Ministry of Justice analysed quantitative data for the report.
For more information, listen to an interview on Radio NZ with Former Chief District Court Judge Jan-Marie Doogue (who was to be sworn in as a Justice of the High Court on 19 August 2019).
Victim advocates Louise Nicholas and Chief Victims Advisor Dr Kim McGregor welcomed the report findings.
Background information
For more information on the pilot, see our previous story New sexual violence court process to be piloted in Whangārei and Auckland and the research report Improving the justice response to victims of sexual violence: Victims' experiences (2018)
Related news
The Law Commission published the final report of the review of the Evidence Act 2006 which including a specific focus on rules of evidence related to sexual and family violence.
The Chief Victims Advisor Dr Kim McGregor has released two reports related to strengthening the criminal justice system for victims/survivors. This includes a report on the results from a survey of victims/survivors and a report summarising a workshop that took place in March 2019.
Related research
Professor Elisabeth McDonald from the University of Canterbury is "currently leading four projects, which are documenting the nature and process of questioning adult rape complainants. The aim of these projects, which include an evaluation of the questioning processes in the Specialist Sexual Violence Court Pilot, is to propose legal and procedural changes that are responsive to some of the concerns expressed about unfairness."
Update: New research from the University of Auckland identifies the need to address the experiences of Young Witnesses in New Zealand’s Sexual Violence Pilot Courts (2020). A new OpenAccess book Rape myths as barriers to fair trial process: comparing adult rape trials with those in the Aotearoa Sexual Violence Court Pilot (2020) has been published.
Related media
The ‘promising young athlete’ cliche risks erasing the victim’s reality, Spinoff, 14.08.2019
Teenage rapist 'got off very lightly' after admitting sex attacks on two girls, Stuff, 13.08.2019
Jan Logie: The Government’s secret success story, Newsroom, 26.07.2019
Police approach to rape has improved, results haven’t, Newsroom, 17.05.2019
Trial of man accused of indecently touching boys ends in hung jury, RNZ, 16.05.2019
Slut-shaming for women and protection for men: is this system fair? Stuff, 12.05.2019
It's time to better the odds for victims of sexual crime, Editorial: Stuff, 11.05.2019
Suppression in serial groping case lifts for Trembath after rape acquittal, RNZ, 09.05.2019
Submissions are open on the bill to reform abortion law. This includes changes to the Crimes Act 1961 and the Contraception, Sterilisation, and Abortion Act 1977.
The deadline to make a submission is 19 September 2019.
The omnibus Abortion Legislation Bill would decriminalise abortion, better align the regulation of abortion services with other health services, and modernise the legal framework for abortion.
Justice Minister Andrew Little outlined key aspects of the bill:
- "remove any statutory test on the health practitioner for a woman who is not more than 20 weeks pregnant
- for a woman who is more than 20 weeks pregnant, require the heath practitioner to reasonably believe the abortion is appropriate with regard to the pregnant woman’s physical and mental health, and well-being
- ensure that health practitioners advise women of the availability of counselling services if they are considering an abortion or have had an abortion, although counselling will not be mandatory
- ensure that a woman can self-refer to an abortion service provider
- enable a regulation-making power to set up safe areas around specific abortion facilities, on a case-by-case basis
- ensure that practitioners who object to providing services on the grounds of conscience must inform the pregnant women about their objection, and that the woman can obtain the services elsewhere
- retain the criminal offence for unqualified people who attempt to procure an abortion on a pregnant woman or supply the means for procuring an abortion
- retain the criminal offence of killing an unborn child for any person who causes harm to a pregnant woman and in doing so causes the death of a fetus"
Andrew Little said:
“Abortion is the only medical procedure that is still a crime in New Zealand. It’s time for this to change. This Bill will modernise the laws on abortion, by removing it from the Crimes Act and bringing the law into line with many other developed countries. Safe abortion should be treated and regulated as a health issue; a woman has the right to choose what happens to her body."
The transcript of the bill's First Reading in Parliament is available on Hansard.
Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern spoke about her commitment to removing abortion from the Crimes Act and the bill's provision to require health practitioner authorisation after 20 weeks.
Jackie Edmond, Chief Executive of NZ Family Planning noted "The proposed approach isn’t what the broader health community, including Family Planning, recommended and is really a missed opportunity to put all women front and centre of the process." Family Planning and others supported the Law Commission's Model A, which had no statutory test for abortions. However Jackie Edmond said "It is positive that the government is moving forward with reforming our abortion laws and offering a framework that is an improvement to the laws we currently have."
NZ Family Planning has produced an Abortion Law Reform information sheet providing answers to common questions about the reform. Also see these media releases from Family Planning:
- Abortion a common procedure - statistics show (17.06.2019)
- Values have changed - laws should too (20.06.2019)
- UN recommends abortion law changes (25.01.2019)
The Abortion Law Reform Association of New Zealand (ALRANZ) has provided an analysis of the bill.
Background information
In 2018, the Government asked the Law Commission to examine abortion law and provide advice on options for reform. The Law Commission's process included consultation with stakeholders and the public. The Law Commission submitted a briefing paper outlining options. See our previous news article about the briefing paper and responses to the Law Commission's work.
Update: United Nations experts have released a joint statement calling all states to ensure access to safe and legal abortion as an essential reproductive healthcare service for women and girls and stating it is critical to ensure their fundamental right to autonomy, equality and to physical and mental health.
Related research
There are multiple links between intimate partner violence, sexual violence and reproductive health and justice.
Reproductive coercion is a form of intimate partner violence. It includes behaviours that interfere with or control people's choices about accessing contraception, reproductive health and pregnancy (e.g. trying to get a person pregnant, or control a person's decision-making around a pregnancy).
Intimate partner violence and women's reproductive health (Fanslow, 2017).
This review article notes women's experience of violence and sexual and reproductive coercion impacts on pregnancy intendedness. It also notes women who have experienced IPV are more likely to terminate a pregnancy, with one study reporting a 2.5 times increased likelihood of termination of pregnancy.
The National Collective of Independent Women’s Refuges published a report, Reproductive coercion in Aotearoa New Zealand (2018).
This research found "a significant number of these research participants had experienced controlled access to contraceptives, birth control sabotage and pregnancy pressure from an intimate partner. Over one third of participants had experienced a partner trying to prevent them accessing an abortion, and just over one quarter had experienced a partner attempting to pressure them into terminating a pregnancy. Just under one third had also experienced a partner deliberately trying to cause them to miscarry, for example by using physical violence." (p.4)
See also:
Hidden forces: Shining a light on reproductive coercion - Marie Stopes Australia white paper (2018)
Reproductive Justice & Violence Against Women: Understanding the Intersections, VAWnet special collection (2017)
Reproductive coercion Clearinghouse Connector - Women's Health Victoria list of articles (2015)
For further information search the NZFVC library under reproductive coercion.
Update: Researchers and staff from Family Planning New Zealand published the article Reproductive justice in Aotearoa New Zealand—A viewpoint narrative in December 2023 in the Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Journal.
Related media
Contraception important for New Zealanders, Beehive Press Release, 15.11.2019
Here’s why there should be no gestational limits for abortion, The Conversation, 12.08.2019
Abortion law reform just leapt its first hurdle. Here’s what the MPs said, Spinoff, 09.08.2019
Abortion bill: What's actually changing and when, Stuff, 08.08.2019
No test for abortion up to 20 weeks, Newsroom, 05.08.2019
Sweeping abortion law changes: Woman's right to choose until 20 weeks, NZ Herald, 05.08.2019
The Ministry of Justice has issued a Request for Information (RFI) on the Government Electronic Tenders Service (GETS) for Restorative Justice services.
The purpose of the RFI is to identify providers that are interested in future opportunities to deliver adult pre-sentence Restorative Justice services for standard or family violence cases, or both, for one or more of the 56 court locations around New Zealand that are currently serviced for Restorative Justice delivery.
This is in preparation for the upcoming Restorative Justice (RJ) open procurement proces.
Providers who are interested in delivering Restorative Justice services for standard or family violence cases, or want to know more about the RFI, can find more information on the GETS website:
GETS: Restorative Justice Services (reference 21377107)
The Ministry of Justice encourages any interested providers to respond to the RFI. Submissions for the RFI will be accepted at any time until Wednesday 28 August 2019.
Related research and resources
The Ministry of Justice has produced several publications on restorative justice.
For more research and information, see the Restorative Justice topic search in the NZFVC library.
Background information
See our previous news article:
Ministry of Justice publishes updated restorative justice framework (September 2017)
The next phase of the national Māori Inquiry into Oranga Tamariki - Ministry for Children is a hui on Monday 19 August 2019 in Hamilton.
Whānau Ora announced this will be to confirm the scope and purpose of the inquiry.
Following this, the Kīngitanga has invited Whānau Ora Commissioning Agency and the inquiry governance group to attend Ngā Kawe Mate o te Motu at Tūrangawaewae Marae on Tuesday 20 August, where the inquiry’s Terms of Reference will be presented.
The draft Terms of Reference are currently available on the Commissioning Agency’s website. Whānau are invited to provide feedback on this until submissions close on Friday 16 August, by emailing maoriinquiry@whanauora.nz.
Following the confirmation of the Terms of Reference, the inquiry will commence. The aim is to have a final substantive report published in early 2020.
Merepeka Raukawa-Tait, Chair of the Whānau Ora Commissioning Agency, said
"We were heartened by the turnout at the first hui and everyone’s valuable contribution. This second hui will keep the momentum going and allow us to move forward on this important ‘for Māori, by Māori’ inquiry."
Whānau Ora said the initial call for action came from Māori leadership concerned with the practice of tamariki removals by the State. The response to this call was "overwhelming" with several hundred people attending the first hui, hosted by the Whānau Ora Commissioning Agency on Saturday 13 July. This included whānau, many Māori leaders and highly skilled Māori from a variety of areas, including governance, researchers, clinicians and practitioners, who supported the call for a Māori-led inquiry and participated in wānanga to inform its scope and purpose.
At the hui it was confirmed a Governing Group would oversee the Inquiry, with the following membership:
- Dame Naida Glavish
- Dame Areta Kopu
- Dame June Mariu
- Dame Iritana Tawhiwhirangi
- Dame Tariana Turia
- Lady Tureiti Moxon
- Sir Toby Cutis
- Sir Mason Durie
- Sir Wira Gardiner
- Sir Pita Sharples
- Sir Robert McLeod
- Sir Mark Solomon
Registrations are open for the hui on Monday 19 August 2019 in Hamilton.
Update: Waatea News livestreamed the hui. The full video recording of the hui is now available online.
Related news
On 30 July 2019, Hands Off Our Tamariki organised a rally to Parliament to demand the halting of state abuse of Māori tamariki And whānau. The rally was facilitated by Leonie Pihama, Tere Harrison and Laura O’Connell Rapira, with invited speakers including Dame Tariana Turia, Paora Moyle, Prue Kapua, Alison Green, Khylee Quince, Des Ratima, Ripeka Ormsby, Annette Sykes, Rihi Te Nana and Jean Te Huia. The organisers called for a number of changes and presented an open letter to the NZ government.
Advocate Paora Crawford Moyle has given a talk on Oranga Tamariki at the 16th Annual Waitangi Rua Rautau 2019 at Tangatarua Marae, Ihenga Whare Tupuna, Rotorua on 28 July 2019.
Background information
The independent Māori inquiry into the Ministry of Children - Oranga Tamariki was launched following media coverage of an attempted uplift of a baby from their mother in Hawke's Bay. This focused attention on Oranga Tamariki's practices and removal of Māori babies from their whānau, hapū and iwi and led to many calls for change.
In response, three separate government reviews were announced. These are being conducted by Oranga Tamariki, the Children's Commissioner and the Chief Ombudsman.
In an interview with Newshub, Merepeka Raukawa-Tait, the chair of the Whanau Ora Commissioning Agency (North Island) said Whānau Ora were responding to calls and questions from iwi leaders around the country asking what Whānau Ora was doing. She said other reviews and inquiries done by others lack a Māori lens, and this inquiry is by Māori, for Māori, with Māori.
Following the first hui, the North Island Whānau Ora Commissioning Agency said "Yesterday the largest gathering of Māori leadership since the Foreshore and Seabed debate voted unanimously to hold an Inquiry." A recording of the hui is available online.
Related research and reports
New research has found that Māori children are almost four times more likely than those of European descent to be placed out of home by child protection services.
Professor Denise Wilson (Ngāti Tahinga), co-author of the study and Director of the Taupua Waiora Centre for Māori Health Research at Auckland University of Technology (AUT), said "We found strong disparities for Māori across all levels of child protection involvement, but the placement figures were particularly alarming."
By the age of 18, a Māori child had a one in 14 chance of being placed out of home, whereas a child of European ethnicity had just a one in 50 chance of the same outcome. The researchers said "While poverty is known to make maltreatment more likely, stratification by neighbourhood deprivation did not change the findings. That is, the gap between the experiences of Māori children and European children remained, regardless of economic status."
The latest Oranga Tamariki quarterly report on the safety of children in care has found that over the three-month period to March 2019, more than 100 children in state care (some were living with their parents) were harmed sexually, physically, or emotionally. More than three quarters of the children harmed were Māori.
Related media
New uplift figures paint disturbing ‘racialised’ picture, Newsroom, 27.08.2019
Tūhoe steps up for child protection role, Waatea News, 26.08.2019
Putting Tamariki first: A report from Tūhoe country, Newshub, 24.08.2019
Abused and suffering in the care of Oranga Tamariki: Karisma Emery's story, Stuff, 19.08.2019
Māori leaders launch inquiry into tamariki being taken from their whānau, Stuff, 19.08.2019
Children's Commissioner backs Māori inquiry, Waatea News, 19.08.2019
State care of children has 'failed', says Minister, Stuff, 16.08.2019
Te Arawa challenges Children's Minister over uplifts, Waatea News, 16.08.2019
‘No second chance’ to fix child welfare system, Newsroom, 12.08.2019
Hands Off Our Tamariki marchers reject collaboration, Waatea News, 01.08.2019
Constitutional change behind hīkoi call, Waatea News, 31.07.2019
‘Tears of our tupuna’ as Māori meet for change, Newsroom, 31.07.2019
Marchers call for family support first, Otago Daily Times, 31.07.2019
Hundreds rally to call for change at Oranga Tamariki, RNZ, 30.07.2019
March for justice on NZ’s ‘taken generation’, Newsroom, 30.07.2019
'Bullying, harassment and illegal practices' used to describe Oranga Tamariki, RNZ, 30.07.2019
‘Oranga Whānau is Oranga Tamariki’, Press Release: The Māori Party, Scoop, 30.07.2019
Christchurch Hands Off Our Tamariki protesters call for end to 'inhumane' uplifts, Stuff, 30.07.2019
Child uplift policies cultural genocide, Waatea News, 30.07.2019
Winston Peters says Māori need to address violence against women and children, NZ Herald, 29.07.2019
Oranga Tamariki 'our job to fix', Winston Peters says ahead of Parliament protest, Stuff, 29.07.2019
Guardianship orders threat to whakapapa, Waatea News, 26.07.2019
Listen to Māori midwives – they know more than you think, The Spinoff, 23.07.2019
Māori children over-represented in state care harm figures, RNZ, 23.07.2019
Legality and 'disconnection' between Māori kids and whānau, RNZ, 23.07.2019
AUT Professor Denise Wilson on Paakiwaha, Waatea News, 23.07.2019
New law returns child to whānau in Oranga Tamariki dispute, RNZ, 22.07.2019
Babies in Oranga Tamariki care - safe or seized?, RNZ, 21.07.2019
Simon Shepherd interviews Maori leaders, Press release: TVNZ, Scoop, 20.07.2019
'Systemic inequality' in Māori involvement in child protection, RNZ, 19.07.2019
Māori mothers fear and mistrust 'systemically racist' authorities, Stuff, 19.07.2019
More residential homes could stop Oranga Tamariki uplifts, RNZ, 19.07.2019
Helen Leahy: Not one more Māori child should be left in isolation from its whānau, Stuff, 19.07.2019
The children come first: A day at the Oranga Tamariki hui, The Spinoff, 16.07.2019
Māori plant flag over uplifted children, RNZ, 16.07.2019
Māori unite to declare ‘enough is enough’, Newsroom, 15.07.2019
Should the practice of Whāngai be recognised in New Zealand law?, One News, 15.07.2019
A sense of injustice too large to fathom, Newsroom, 14.07.2019
The call from the hui was loud and clear: give us back our kids, The Spinoff, 14.07.2019
Chief Victims Advisor Dr Kim McGregor has released two reports related to strengthening the criminal justice system for victims/survivors of crime.
The first is the results from a survey of victims/survivors of crime which was carried out in February 2019.
The second summarises a two-day workshop that took place in March 2019, also focused on victims/survivors' experiences of the criminal justice system.
“Through the survey, a majority of victims also told us that the criminal justice system doesn’t keep them safe, doesn’t provide them with enough support or information, and does not listen to their views, concerns or needs.
... It’s clear that we need to do better for victims. Victims’ needs, which are diverse and often complex, must be at the heart of any criminal justice reform."
Survey report
The Strengthening the Criminal Justice System for Victims survey asked victims/survivors of crime about their experiences of the current criminal justice system, what works well, what doesn’t work well, and how things could be improved. There were 620 responses to the survey.
Key findings from the survey include:
- 63% of respondents reported that their overall experience of the criminal justice system was either poor or very poor.
- 83% of respondents either disagreed or strongly disagreed that the criminal justice system is safe for victims.
- 77% of respondents either disagreed or strongly disagreed that victims’ views, concerns and needs are listened to throughout the justice process.
- 79% of respondents either disagreed or strongly disagreed that victims have enough information and support (not including family and friends) throughout the justice process.
The survey report identified four key themes:
"1. The ideology of the criminal justice system is wrong: This theme covers the ideological failings of the current system, including the call for a paradigm shift from an offender-focussed system to one which is victim-focussed, the call for a shift from the adversarial system, and discussion of the values that victims envisioned for a future system. Also included in this theme is discussion about the system not working for Māori, the system not meeting the complex needs of victims, the call for a tougher approach on crime, and the call for a more rehabilitative approach.
2. The criminal justice system is failing to keep victims safe: This theme covers safety in several different ways, including physical safety, psychological safety, and financial safety. It highlights the call from victims that the system should keep victims safe throughout the court process, the system should keep victims safe beyond the court, the system should focus on supporting the victim, and the system should keep whānau and communities safe.
3. The criminal justice system is failing to communicate with victims: This theme comprises the system failing to keep victims informed, and the system failing to listen to victims or enable their voice to be heard.
4. The workforce of the criminal justice system can do better: This theme reflects negative feedback that we received about the workforce of the criminal justice system but also highlights ‘shining examples in the dark’: individuals and organisations that made a positive difference to victims’ journeys through the criminal justice system."
For each theme, the report examines the related findings including quotes from victims/survivors.
Workshop playback report
In March 2019, Dr Kim McGregor hosted a two-day workshop, Hāpaitia te Oranga Tangata Safe and Effective Justice: Strengthening the Criminal Justice System for Victims. The workshop was attended by 160 victims, victim advocates, judiciary, government officials and victim experts. The workshop playback report captures discussion from the workshop.
The detailed report includes a summary of key messages from speakers and a table that outlines solutions across a number of issues. However, the main focus of the report collates feedback for 18 specific topics or issues. For each one of these, the report looks at what the issues are, the reality and gaps in the system, and solutions. These include issues for victims of sexual and family violence and a number of specific populations including Māori, Pasifika, ethnic and migrant communities, the Rainbow community, "vulnerable victims", children, and male victims of sexual abuse and violence.
For responses and commentary from advocates, see the media below.
Background information
Dr McGregor shared initial findings from the survey in her speech at the Strengthening the Criminal Justice System for Victims workshop in Wellington in March 2019.
The survey and workshop are part of the Government's wider criminal justice reform efforts, Hāpaitia te Oranga Tangata Safe and Effective Justice. The reports from the survey and workshop complement other reports from the criminal justice reform process, including:
Report from Hui Māori: Ināia Tonu Nei - criminal justice reform
First report on criminal justice reform from Te Uepū Advisory Group
For more information see our previous news stories:
Justice reform survey open for victims/survivors of crime
Criminal Justice Advisory Group public meetings; related research and reports
Summit and new advisory group to focus on criminal justice reform
Related news
Update: Victim Support has released their final report Victims’ Voices: The Justice Needs and Experiences of New Zealand Serious Crime Victims (2019). The report summarises findings from in-depth interviews with 32 victims of serious crime. They found that 68% of victims felt that justice had not been served in their case, despite 86% of cases resulting in a guilty verdict and 52% in imprisonment of the offender.
The Salvation Army has published Reconsidering the Aotearoa New Zealand Criminal Justice Policy Model (2019), the first of three briefing notes exploring criminal justice policy.
Related media
Departures will not 'hurt' justice reform group's report, RNZ, 23.08.2019
Borrows’ sense of justice guides sector reform, Newsroom, 14.08.2019
The latest Ministry of Social Development (MSD) email update for family violence and sexual violence service providers covers a number of areas of work.
You can view the updates online and subscribe to receive them to your inbox.
The August 2019 update includes:
- Update on MSD's visits to sexual violence service providers
- Research commissioned into sexual violence and outcomes including mental health issues, substance use/abuse and suicide, and the costs associated with sexual violence
- Update on Oranga Tamariki's funding of sexual harm services for children
- Whānau Resilience presentations nearly completed; update on Pouwhakataki roles
- New project on accessing family violence helpline support, led by National Collective of Independent Women’s Refuges
- Ministry of Justice has updated Protection Order forms
- Registration open for national conference ‘Challenging Conversations and Complicated Spaces: Titiro whakamuri, kia anga whakamua – Sexual and Domestic Violence Specialist Services reflecting forward’ on 12-13 September in Wellington (see the conference website)
Read all past updates and sign up to receive future updates on the MSD website.
For questions about sexual violence service development email CI_Sexual_Violence_Services@msd.govt.nz and about the family violence work programme contact Family_Violence_CPP@msd.govt.nz.
Related media
An innovative approach to family violence, Newsroom, 23.08.2019
Govt takes notes from startup sector to tackle country's big problems, RNZ, 09.08.2019
Media has continued to highlight ongoing reports of sexual harassment and assault and bullying in workplaces, sporting organisations, universities and other organisations around the country.
These are summarised below, followed by steps being taken towards change.
Ongoing reports
Statistics New Zealand released the results of the Survey of working life conducted in 2018, which asked employed people about their work arrangements, employment conditions, and satisfaction with their job and work-life balance. 14% of women and 9% of men said they had experienced discrimination, harassment, or bullying at work during the previous year. Results are available by ethnicity, age group, occupation group and more.
In February 2019, Stuff reported that hundreds of women, and some men, have come forward over the last year to share their stories through the #metoo investigation:
"We found evidence to suggest sexual harassment is endemic in a wide range of industries in New Zealand, in companies of every size. We identified recurring themes in these stories, shared experiences that happened over and over again."
This followed Journalist Alison Mau launching the #metoo investigation into cases of sexual harassment and assault in Aotearoa New Zealand in February 2018, following Newsroom's story about allegations of sexual assault and harassment at law firm Russell McVeagh.
As more women have come forward and media has continued to report people's stories, some organisations have also publically disclosed issues within their workplaces and communities including how they are responding.
Government departments and organisations
The New Zealand Defence Force issued an apology to former naval officer Hayley Browne along with a confidential compensation payment. The apology was issued by Attorney General David Parker on behalf of the Defence Force for not providing a safe work environment after she said she was raped by a British naval employee while on deployment with the Defence Force, and was sexually harassed.
Radio NZ reported statistics from NZ Defence Force (NZDF) showing an increase in reporting of sexual violence since the launch of Operation RESPECT. The majority of reports were made by women. The statistics were included in an update on Operation RESPECT, released to Radio NZ under an Official Information Act request. Operation RESPECT was launched in 2016 to address harmful and inappropriate sexual behaviour in the NZDF. Two men also spoke out about sexual violence they experienced at Burnham Military Camp by other men in 1970s. NZDF is piloting bystander training in 2019.
A Police officer was arrested and charged with sexually assaulting another Police officer. The officer has been stood down and is expected to go to trial in early 2020. NZ Police also issued a statement they were conducting an employment investigation into behaviour of off-duty Police officers on the same night, but would not confirm if this was related to the sexual assault charge.
Media reported statistics on the number of staff complaints of harassment including sexual harassment at the Department of Corrections. In 2018, Corrections launched a programme to address sexual harassment, staff training and an 0800 number for staff.
These events followed complaints of workplace bullying by now Deputy Commissioner of Police Wally Haumaha in 2016. An investigation by the Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA) concluded that Haumaha's behaviour had been "inappropriate and unprofessional" and that he had acted "improperly." The State Services Commission (SSC) reviewed how the Ministry of Justice and the Department of Corrections handled the bullying complaints, found they did not meet standards and made recommendations for change.
Media outlet Stuff reported a lack of response to a senior social worker's reports of bullying and sexual harassment at Oranga Tamariki - Ministry for Children. After the story ran, more staff came forward to share their stories of workplace bullying at the Ministry.
Stuff reported the State Services Commission has been working to establish a new set of standards to address workplace bullying in government agencies.
Parliament and political parties
The Labour Party is reviewing an internal investigation into complaints made by several party members and officials about bullying, intimidation, sexual harassment and sexual assault by a Labour Party staff member. Their complaints were investigated in March 2019. After concerns were raised about the investigation being mishandled, the party is now reviewing its processes. Media reported several party members resigned over the investigation.
Several recent reports and surveys have examined bullying and harassment in the Parliamentary workplace and political parties including:
- The Speaker of the House of Representatives of New Zealand released the report of the independent review of bullying and harassment in the Parliamentary workplace.
- The National Party released health and safety recommendations following a review of their health and safety policy.
- The New Zealand chapter of the cross-party Commonwealth Women Parliamentarians surveyed female MPs about their experiences with sexism and sexual harassment.
Sports organisations
High Performance Sport New Zealand (HPSNZ) and Sport NZ set up an independent complaints service for people to raise concerns about bullying, harassment, inappropriate behaviour and athlete welfare in high performance sports. The service is an interim solution while a system wide permanent solution is developed for both high performance and community sport. More information is available about the service on the HPSNZ website.
A review of Cycling NZ found a culture of bullying, poor behaviour, lack of accountability and an inappropriate relationship. Following this, Stuff reported that High Performance Sport NZ has drawn up a coach-athlete relationship policy framework.
A review of NZ Football substantiated formal complaints of harassment and bullying by the Football Ferns coach, Andreas Heraf.
Sport NZ launched a review of integrity issues in sport in 2018. The review includes a number of areas including sexual harassment and protecting children from abuse. The review launched with a public consultation.
Early 2019 also saw calls made for New Zealand Cricket to address concerns about sexism and sexual violence, following Scott Kuggeleijn playing for the Black Caps. New Zealand Cricket and Westpac Stadium were also criticised for removing banners promoting sexual consent during a game.
Universities
Stuff reported preliminary results from a study of 2700 students at New Zealand Universities about sexual violence, finding that 41% of women reported sexual assault, and 22% of men. 88% of reported perpetrators were men and 17% of reported perpetrators were women. The research is being carried out by an Otago University PhD student.
The University of Otago student magazine Critic Te Arohi reported stories of sexual harassment and rape at the residential hall Knox College between 2011 and 2017. The story highlighted that college leadership failed to take action despite the women's efforts to report the incidents. Since the story was published, more than 30 more people have come forward with similar reports. The Vice Chancellor of University of Otago called a hui for female Residential Assistants to talk about women's safety in residential colleges.
Media has previously highlighted that sexual assault and harassment is widespread among New Zealand university halls of residence.
Also in early 2019, former Massey University Associate Professor Grant Hannis was convicted of indecently assaulting an 82 year old woman with dementia. He was sentenced to eight months’ home detention, 100 hours of community work and $3000 in emotional-harm reparation. Advocacy group Grey Power called the sentence "shockingly inadequate." One of the reasons his sentence was reduced was "previous excellent character." Female students from Massey University reported they made complaints about intimidation, aggression and inappropriate jokes about sexual assault by Hannis, but the University did not take adequate action.
In 2018, two students at Victoria University came forward about their experiences of making formal complaints of sexual harassment by a tutor and the University's lack of action. At the time, a Victoria University lecturer said one of the issues was the lack of a clear pathway and policy to handle sexual harassment. The University has recently published a draft stand-alone Sexual Harassment Prevention Policy and associated procedures for consultation.
Also in 2018, the New Zealand University Students' Association (NZUSA) investigated allegations an employee sent multiple inappropriate photos to fellow employees working on a campus sexual violence prevention programme. The programme was funded through a contract with ACC, which was subsequently cancelled when the sexual harassment issues came to light.
Media
A former TVNZ employee came forward about her experiences of sexual harassment and assault by a senior employee in 2010 and the lack of response after she reported the incident to human resources. TVNZ released a statement saying they were saddened to hear about the unacceptable behaviour, had a zero tolerance policy and asked others to come forward.
Journalist Alison Mau also spoke about experiences of sexual harassment and pay inequity.
Law
The NZ Law Society is working through changes to their regulatory process for lawyers accused of inappropriate behaviour. The Deans of New Zealand's law schools have developed and agreed to best practice standards for a safe and appropriate culture and environment for law students employed in law firms.
Steps towards change
Internationally, a new international Convention was passed to eliminate violence and harassment at work at the International Labour Organisation (ILO) in Geneva in June 2019. New Zealand Council of Trade Unions President Richard Wagstaff said,
"International agreements are vitally important in ensuring that working people are protected in their own country but also that international law exists which provides further protection. The next step is getting our own Government to ratify this Convention and checking the adequacy of our own national laws and policies to ensure working people are able to work free from violence and harassment."
Earlier in the negotiating process, the UN Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women released a Joint Statement with the Platform of women’s rights mechanisms on violence and harassment in the world of work, expressing concerns about the regressive positions expressed by some States.
In July, the Human Rights Commission released an updated guide with new information on making a complaint about sexual harassment. The guide provides information on: how the Commission's complaint process works, how an employer should deal with sexual harassment complaints, the mediation process for dealing with a complaint, the process if you've been accused of sexual harassment and where other support is available.
WorkSafe published a sexual harassment toolkit for workplaces.
In 2018, WorkSafe was criticised for not acting on sexual assault and harassment in the workplace and bullying.
Newsroom reported the Government will be reviewing the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 and looking at how to improve the dispute resolution process.
Related resources
Researcher Garth Baker has written a summary article and detailed report about what the #MeToo movement asks of men and how men can effectively respond for the White Ribbon Campaign.
UN Women published
The Royal Commission has announced Chair of the Abuse in Care Inquiry, Sir Anand Satyanand has resigned, effective in November 2019.
Sir Anand said:
"it has been a privilege to Chair the Abuse in Care Inquiry during its setup phase. When the Terms of Reference were announced by the Government in November 2018, the scope of the Inquiry was widened to include faith-based institutions and the scale of the work increased markedly. Because of that and the fact that the ‘set-up’ and development phase of the Inquiry is nearly complete, I have opted to step aside for a new Chair who can lead the Inquiry through to the completion of this important process."
Sir Anand has been appointed Chancellor of Waikato University, for a part-time governance and ceremonial role.
Other recent updates and announcements (made before Sir Anand's resignation) are summarised below.
First public hearings
The first public hearing has been scheduled for the Royal Commission of Inquiry.
The Commission has announced that the first public hearing will take place on 29 October 2019. It is expected to run until 8 November 2019. The venue has not been confirmed yet.
To prepare for the Public hearing, the Commission has scheduled one-day Procedural hearing on 19 August 2019 in Auckland. At the Procedural hearing, the Commission will provide information about the Public hearing. It will be possible to watch the Procedural Hearing live and after the event on the Commission website.
The Commission has published a 2-page provisional scope document which sets out the focus for the Public hearing. The introduction to the scope states:
"The Inquiry will examine two important elements of the establishment of the Royal Commission and its operation:
1.1. The road to the Royal Commission, including the Confidential Listening and Assistance Service, the Confidential Forum for former In-Patients of Psychiatric Hospitals, as well as calls by survivors, human rights leaders and other bodies for a Commission of Inquiry to be established into state and faith-based institutions.
1.2. How Te Tiriti o Waitangi and its principles underpin the investigation as a whole and the issues that will be examined, including the disproportionate extent of abuse in care for whānau Māori."
For more information see What are Public Hearings? from the Inquiry's webpage on Frequently Asked Questions. Also see the Inquiry information for Survivors.
The Commission has also announced that they are accepting applications for individuals, groups, institutions or other organisations who wish to formally participate in the Inquiry, as a 'core participant'. The Commission states that:
A ‘core participant’ is someone who has played, or may have played, a direct and significant role in relation to abuse in care. They can also be someone who has a significant interest in abuse in care, or who may be subject to serious criticism during the Inquiry.
The deadline to apply to be a core participant in the first Public hearing is 26 July 2019.
More information about the hearings and applying to be a core participant see the Minutes from the July 2019 Procedural Hearing.
Survivors can also register to share their story in private sessions.
For questions, contact the Commission on 0800 222 727 or by email counselassist@abuseincare.org.nz.
Concerns about the inquiry process
Media has reported a range of concerns by advocates.
Radio NZ reported that advocate Paora Moyle had raised concerns about how the Commission has handled Harry Tam's involvement with the Inquiry despite a history of domestic violence and ongoing safety concerns raised by women survivors. Mr Tam was the director of policy and research in the inquiry's secretariat team then the facilitator of the Survivor Advisory Group. Ms Moyle criticised the Commission's lack of action and lack of a complaints procedure to address concerns. The Commission issued a statement that the matter had been referred to the police and that an independent investigation into the allegations would be conducted by Maria Dew QC.
Media also reported that concerns were raised by survivors and advocates about the process of early private hearings held by the Commission. A number of survivors said they had been treated poorly and that this reflected the commission's lack of care and experience. Executive Director Mervin Singham responded to these concerns in an interview with Newshub. The Commission also published conflict management plans. See further comments from survivors and advocates in the media below.
Related news
In May the Government published information about how the government plans to respond to the Royal Commission of Inquiry.
In June the Ministry of Social Development announced that a Crown secretariat has been set up to coordinate and align the Crown’s engagement across and between agencies for the Royal Commission of Inquiry.
The Ministry of Social Development has been working on revising the process for responding to claims of historic abuse in state care.
Related media
Confidentiality clauses: Bishops 'lack moral leadership', RNZ, 27.09.2019
Commission ran background checks without consent, Newsroom, 26.09.2019
Royal Commission: Calls for commissioner Paul Gibson to step down, RNZ, 25.09.2019
Tracey Martin considers action after royal commission blunder, Newsroom, 24.09.2019
Sex offender in inquiry meetings: Minister says her hands are tied, Stuff, 24.09.2019
Child sex offender in meetings with abuse survivors, Newsroom, 24.09.2019
Royal Commission: Sex offender at gatherings with abuse survivors, NZ Herald, 24.09.2019
State care abuse not just 'historical', inquiry told, Stuff, 19.08.2019
Royal Commission hearing: Churches consider dropping confidentiality agreements, RNZ, 19.08.2019
Survivor backs push to lift veil on church child abuse secret deals, Stuff, 15.08.2019
Abuse inquiry on track despite losing head, Waatea News, 09.08.2019
Paora Crawford Moyle talks to Dale Husband, Waatea News, 08.08.2019
Māori partnership essential as abuse inquiry changes head, Waatea News, 07.08.2019
Resignation of Sir Anand Satyanand, Beehive Press Release, 06.08.2019
Sir Anand Satyanand steps down as head of inquiry into historical abuse, RNZ, 06.08.2019
Archives info error: 'It's a breach of my basic human rights', RNZ, 24.07.2019
Inquiry into abuse in state care orders security checks for vulnerable women, Stuff, 14.07.2019
Abuse in state care royal commission begins public hearings, RNZ, 25.06.2019
'Alone in a room with no support': Abuse survivor slams Royal Commission, Newshub, 15.06.2019
Lawyer loses confidence in state care abuse inquiry, Radio NZ, 10.06.2019
Royal Commission’s ‘mock’ sessions with survivors, Newsroom, 10.06.2019
Ongoing issues with the inquiry into state care risk its very survival, Stuff, 11.04.2019
Questions on conflict of interest in abuse inquiry 'shut down', Radio NZ, 08.04.2019
Minister refuses state abuse inquiry chair's resignation amid conflict criticism, Stuff, 07.04.2019

No results found.
Please try different keywords or filter options.