He pitopito kōrero
News
News stories
Sport Integrity Commission launched
Sport Integrity Commission Te Kahu Raunui is a newly established independent Crown entity. It is tasked with promoting and protecting the safety and well-being of participants and the fairness of competition in the sport and recreation sector. This includes protecting participants from abuse and harm.
The Commission works with organisations at all levels, including national and regional organisations, Māori sport organisations, and local clubs. The Commission also sets standards to make sure there is guidance on making sport and recreation safer. Some of these standards are set out in the Code of Integrity for Sport and Recreation (also known as the Integrity Code).
The Commission has information and resources on their website for child safeguarding – actions that everyone can take to protect children and young people from abuse and harm. This includes protecting them from emotional, physical and sexual abuse, and neglect. Information on the website addresses:
- safe rides and carpooling for children and young people
- checking and training people working with children
- taking and sharing images
- identifying and preventing grooming
- planning safer trips away and safeguarding while travelling.
There are policy templates addressing these areas as well.
The Commission also has information and resources on their website for participant protection - this involves safeguarding participants against any form of abuse, harassment or discrimination. There is information addressing sexual misconduct, harmful behaviour, racism and unlawful discrimination, and retaliation and victimisation.
The Commission provides a free dispute resolution service for complaints about integrity in sport and recreation, including complaints about bullying, sexual misconduct and racism. The service is for everyone in sport and recreation. This includes people playing or volunteering at local clubs and people working or competing at regional, national and international levels. Children and young people as well as adults can use this service. The Commission also provides support and guidance to sport and recreation organisations to handle complaints appropriately.
More information
The Commission was created in response to Aotearoa and international independent reviews that had previously identified bullying, abuse, and other harmful behaviour in sport. The government set up the Sport Integrity Working Group to look at how to best manage integrity and safety in Aotearoa sport and recreation. Based on the Working Group recommendations, the government passed the Integrity Sport and Recreation Act 2023. The Act established the Commission and its responsibilities. See the Commission website for more information. See our related news below for more information about the work to address harm and safety in sport.
Researchers from Canada published the article A Rapid Review on Complaint Mechanisms for Interpersonal Violence: Integrating Research-Based Recommendations from Multiple Sectors to Inform Sport Settings (2024). The authors reviewed published literature about complaint mechanisms for interpersonal violence in a variety of settings. Interpersonal violence included various forms of abuse, neglect, bullying, harassment and other forms of harm for both children and adults. Based on the review, the authors outline 18 recommendations to improve complaint mechanisms for interpersonal violence related to: organisational accountability, awareness and accessibility, adapted process and ongoing evaluation.
For additional research and information see the related news stories below and search our library under sport and family and sexual violence including prevention.
Related media
New body for a fresh start in sport, RNZ, 11.07.2024
Marlborough coach pleads guilty to sexual offending against several girls, RNZ, 18.12.2023
Marlborough sports coach faces 35 sex abuse charges as more added, Stuff, 05.12.2023
Ten more young women complained about guilty sportsman, The Post, 07.08.2023
Sportsman discharged without conviction for sexual offence, Otago Daily Times, 03.08.2023
Olympic gold medallist Alan Thompson loses battle over 'sexualised remarks', Stuff, 31.07.2023
NZ lagging in protections for female athletes, RNZ, 19.07.2023
Sports integrity officials start work on new rulebook for sport, Stuff, 17.07.2023
Submissions open on legislation to reinstate three strikes law
The Justice Select Committee is calling for submissions on the Sentencing (Reinstating Three Strikes) Amendment Bill.
Submissions are due 23 July 2024.
The Sentencing (Reinstating Three Strikes) Amendment Bill would reinstate the legislative regime for sentencing repeat serious offenders known as the three strikes law. This is an omnibus Bill that would amend the Sentencing Act 2002, the Criminal Procedure Act 2011, the Criminal Procedure (Mentally Impaired Persons) Act 2003, the Evidence Act 2006, and the Parole Act 2002.
The legislation would cover 42 qualifying serious violent and sexual offences. The call for submissions highlights that the proposed legislation would:
- "require that a sentence be served without parole for the second strike
- carry the maximum penalty for the offence, served without parole, for the third strike
- only apply to individuals aged 18 years or older at the time of offending."
In announcing the Bill, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee noted that the Bill includes changes to the previous three strikes regime to make the law more workable. The Beehive media release highlights some of those changes, stating that the Bill:
- "adds the new strangulation and suffocation offence to more than 40 serious violent and sexual offences covered by the previous regime;
- focuses on serious offending by applying the three strikes law only to sentences above 24 months;
- imposes appropriately lengthy non-parole periods for people who commit murder, of 17 years at second strike and 20 years at third strike;
- provides some judicial discretion to avoid manifestly unjust outcomes and address outlier cases;
- sets out principles and guidance to help the court’s application of the new law; and
- allows a limited benefit for guilty pleas to avoid re-traumatising victims, and to reduce court delays."
To learn more, listen to an RNZ interview with Associate Justice Minister McKee about the Bill. For a more detailed overview of the proposed changes see the full text of the Sentencing (Reinstating Three Strikes) Amendment Bill.
The Ministry of Justice Regulatory Impact Statement: Reinstating three strikes sentencing law (2024) highlights that the previous three strikes regime resulted in severely disproportionate sentences and that there is limited evidence that the previous three strikes regime reduced serious crime. The Regulatory Impact Statement recommended option stated "...on every measure, the reintroduction of three strikes will exacerbate existing issues including the over representation of Māori, Pasifika, and young offenders in the justice system." It further stated that:
"the Ministry of Justice prefers the status quo rather than a new three strikes regime due to:
80.1. lack of evidence that the proposal would be effective at addressing repeated serious violent offending or sustainably improving public confidence in the justice system,
80.2. risk of unintended consequences which have been observed in such systems internationally and in New Zealand’s own experience with the former regime,
80.3. known downsides such as cost and issues with consistency of legal obligations, including under the Treaty of Waitangi,
80.4. the current sentencing system already has the capability to respond to serious repeat offending, and
80.5. disproportionate impact of a three strikes regime on population groups, particularly disproportionately harmful impacts on Māori."
The Ministry of Justice Sentencing (Reinstating Three Strikes) Amendment Bill disclosure statement 65 (2024) states:
"Modelling by the Ministry of Justice indicates that most offenders sentenced under the law will be Māori. Claims in the Waitangi Tribunal on behalf of adversely affected Māori are possible. Issues related to sentencing have been raised with the Waitangi Tribunal in Te Rau o te Tika – the Justice System Kaupapa Inquiry (Wai 3060).
No Māori groups or partners have been consulted or engaged on the policy underlying this Bill due to time constraints. Despite strong Māori interests, consultation has not been conducted as the introduction of the Bill has occurred at pace, because the Bill is a priority in the Coalition’s quarterly action plan.
The lack of consultation has not allowed for the development of alternatives which may better mitigate impacts of the three strikes regime on Māori. Aspects of the policy design, such as the qualifying threshold and manifestly unjust exceptions for all mandatory elements, may help mitigate impacts on Māori."
In 2022, the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) provided information about the effectiveness at reducing crime of the previous three strikes legislation in Three Strikes Legislation Repeal Bill, Impact of the three strikes regime on rates of serious crime. MOJ noted that "...there is no consistent pattern to changing crime rates before and after the three strikes regime was introduced in 2010." More specifically, MOJ noted that:
"...there is no evidence for a reduction in the rates of recorded sexual assaults and serious assault offences subject to three strikes legislation since 2010 when the law was enacted. The recorded rate of sexual assaults has increased at a faster rate since 2010 than it did in the 10-year period up to 2010."
For more information, see the Newsroom article The new and (slightly) improved three strikes regime. Academics and lawyers have raised concerns about the Bill. See related media below for more information.
Related news: Updates on justice reforms
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith announced the Government's plans for additional sentencing reforms for the criminal justice system.
Children’s Minister Karen Chhour announced plans to introduce a new Young Serious Offender declaration. Under the planned law, a Youth Court judge will have the final say on declaring someone a Young Serious Offender. A young person would be eligible for the declaration if they are 14 to 17 years old at the time of offending, have had two offences punishable by imprisonment of 10 years or more proven in court and are assessed as being likely to reoffend, with previous interventions having proven unsuccessful. This legislation has not yet been introduced. Under the law currently, the government is progressing with a pilot military-style academy programme based at the youth justice facility in Palmerston North.
A group of more than 30 community organisations presented a petition calling on government to stop the Ram Raid Offending and Related Measures Amendment Bill. The group are "...calling on political leaders to work across political differences and commit to the development of a cross-party accord on youth justice, one grounded in evidence and informed by the lived experience of tamariki, whānau and affected communities." The Ram Raid Offending and Related Measures Amendment Bill is currently in select committee.
Related news
Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced plans for the Government's programme to reform firearms laws. She outlined 4 phases:
- The Firearms Prohibition Orders Legislation Amendment Bill was introduced in March 2024. It is currently before the Justice Committee. Consultation on this bill closed in April 2024. The bill aims to strengthen the role of firearms prohibition orders and provide greater powers to search gang members for firearms.
- Proposals related to regulation of shooting clubs is out for consultation among stakeholders. See more information in the Beehive media release Government to consult on regulation of shooting clubs and ranges and related media below.
- Phase 3 has two components: review of the Firearms Registry announced in June 2024 and transferring the Firearms Safety Authority from Police to another government department.
- Phase 4 will look at rewriting the Arms Act to modernise the law.
Related media
Three strikes entrenching racism, Waatea News, 15.07.2024
New boot camp pilot programme still in design phase, set to start end of July, RNZ, 04.07.2024
Boot camps are back, needed or not, RNZ, 04.07.2024
Three Strikes legislation introduced to parliament, RNZ, 27.06.2024
Try the youth crime approaches that work, Newsroom, 27.06.2024
Three Strikes makes its return: The controversial law explained, Re:News, 26.04.2024
Three Strikes Bill restored despite evidence punishment fails, Te Ao Māori News, 25.06.2024
Revised Three Strikes Bill proceeds to Parliament, RNZ, 25.06.2024
'There's no evidence that three strikes reduces crime' - lawyers, RNZ, 23.04.2024
Three strikes law: Lawyers say repeat offenders 'need help not punishment', Newshub, 23.04.2024
Three Strikes: PM predicts number of offenders to be jailed, One News, 23.04.2024
Three strikes law: 'Ignorant legislation' or effective justice?, One News, 03.04.2024
MSD Accessibility Fund accepting grant applications
The Ministry of Social Development (MSD) is inviting applications for grants from the Accessible Family and Sexual Violence Services for Disabled People Fund (the Accessibility Fund).
Applications are due by 12 August 2024.
The Accessible Family and Sexual Violence Services for Disabled People Fund (the Accessibility Fund) is a new fund from MSD. One of the focus areas for the Accessibility Fund is "Supporting MSD-funded FV/SV providers with the opportunity to apply for funding to improve their physical, digital, and information-based accessibility through a competitive grant process."
Under this focus area, MSD is now inviting grant applications from MSD-funded family violence and sexual violence providers to improve their physical, digital, and information-based accessibility. These are one-off grants of funding up to $75,000. Applications could include developing an accessible website, creating accessible information in alternate formats, or other physical modifications.
To be eligible to apply, applicants must be a current MSD-funded family violence or sexual violence provider who delivers direct to client services at the time of the application closing date – 12 August 2024.
A pre-condition to apply is completing the Accessibility Self-Assessment tool. MSD designed the Accessibility Self-Assessment tool for providers to evaluate their level of accessibility and to help providers identify changes to make their services more accessible. The MSD website has FAQs and guides for the Grants and Self-Assessment tool.
Disability awareness training for MSD-funded providers
Another focus area for the fund includes increasing family violence and sexual violence awareness of accessibility needs and barriers through training. Under this focus area, the Accessibility Fund is supporting introductory disability awareness training for MSD-funded providers. MSD is partnering with Blueprint for Learning and Te Pou to offer a limited number of spaces for providers to participate in a virtual training programme. MSD expects to offer the training in 2025.
To be eligible for the training, providers must complete the Accessibility Self-Assessment tool. The MSD website has more information and a link to register interest for participating in the training.
More information
See the MSD website for more information about the Accessibility Fund grants, training and self-assessment tool. For questions email MSD at accessibilityfund@msd.govt.nz.
Related news
VisAble is a newly established disabled person led organisation in Aotearoa. VisAble encompasses the concepts of visible and enable and sums up in a single word their mission of making violence against disabled people visible, while enabling a more disability responsive family violence and sexual violence system.
Over the past year they have been operating as a prototype, funded by Whaikaha and umbrellaed by People First New Zealand Ngā Tāngata Tuatahi. This way of working was called DAPAR – Disability Abuse Prevention and Response. VisAble has been established in response to disabled people wanting their own disabled person led violence prevention organisation. VisAble is a registered charitable trust, overseen by a Board, and currently appointing a chief executive and recruiting and growing their workforce. As VisAble, the team will support organisations to grow their capability to work alongside disabled people, their families and whānau to enable safer lives; provide Safeguarding Adults support and advice; and provide specialist advice, support and responses to violence, abuse and neglect against disabled people and Adults at Risk. The same services with a new name and new logo, and building on a year of development to inform the way forward.
To make a referral, email refer@daper.co.nz. For questions about the response work, contact Olivia Bloom at Olivia.Bloom@visable.co.nz. For questions about organisational capacity development and other issues, contact Sue Hobbs at sue.hobbs@visable.co.nz.
World Elder Abuse Awareness Day
World Elder Abuse Awareness Day takes place every year on 15 June. Age Concern New Zealand raises awareness of elder abuse across the week 15-22 June. Their theme this year is Spot the Signs of elder abuse. Chief Executive of Age Concern New Zealand, Karen Billings-Jensen, said:
"We see examples of Elder Abuse every day across our Age Concern network. I know people are spotting signs in their families and communities too, but might not be sure if it is Elder Abuse, or know what to do [to] help."
She encourages you to reach out if you are concerned for yourself or someone you know. Minister for Seniors, Casey Costello, said World Elder Abuse Awareness Day is "...the time to highlight that there is help available if older people need it or if anyone is concerned." Minister Costello also shared a video message through the Office of Seniors New Zealand Facebook page.
Learn more about elder abuse from Age Concern. For questions or help you can:
- contact the Elder Abuse Response Service on 0800 32 668 65, text 5032 or email support@elderabuse.nz
- contact Age Concern at 0800 65 2 105
- contact your local Age Concern for services in your area.
New Elder Abuse Response Service providers
The May 2024 Family Violence Sexual Violence Update from the Ministry of Social Development (MSD) announced that there are 11 new providers of Elder Abuse Response Services (EARS):
- Te Ahi Kaa Indigenous Solutions (Auckland)
- TOA Pacific Incorporated (Auckland)
- CNSST Foundation (Auckland)
- VisionWest Community Trust (Auckland)
- Franklin Family Support Trust Board (Auckland)
- Waiuku Family Support Network Charitable Trust (Auckland)
- Raukawa Settlement Trust (South Waikato)
- Hauraki Māori Trust Board (Thames-Coromandel)
- Te Whare Tiaki Wāhine Refuge (Porirua)
- Purapura Whetu Trust (Christchurch)
- Christchurch Resettlement Services (Christchurch)
This brings the total number of Elder Abuse Response Services to 37. The May Update also noted that the MSD 3-year prevention of abuse of older people work programme "...is now focused on delivering two significant research projects: a national prevalence study of the abuse of older people; and research to better understand different cultural perspectives on the abuse of older people."
Recent research related to abuse of older people
Aotearoa research
The Aged Care Commissioner Carolyn Cooper released a report highlighting the need for action to improve the health and disability systems. The report draws on the voices of thousands of older people, their families including carers, and service providers to outline core issues in health and disability services for older people. The report includes areas the Aged Care Commissioner plans to further explore including key points related to changing how the system supports older people to age well:
- "Using strengths-based language to consider health and disability needs of older people
- Addressing stigma, bias, and barriers to older people seeking support or using services, especially by providing coordinated, accessible information on available services to reach those in isolated and rural communities
- Strategies and interventions to end the stigma of loneliness and promote social connection
- Considering links between housing, transport, and socio-economic resources to older people’s health and wellbeing
- Addressing violence against older persons as a determinant of health that requires particular attention, including aspects that are especially prevalent in instances of violence against older people as a family violence issue, eg, financial exploitation and abuse, self-neglect by older people, hoarding, etc."
Read the full report Amplifying the voices of older people in Aotearoa New Zealand (2024).
MSD published a review of the initiatives funded through the Elder Abuse Prevention Fund. A key finding from the review was that the "initiatives uncovered a substantial scale of need in this space." Staff involved in the initiatives also highlighted service availability and resource gaps in their communities. For more information see the report Gathering insights from the Elder Abuse Prevention Fund: a learning and insights review prepared for the Office for Seniors (2024). Learn more about the Elder Abuse Prevention Fund from the Office for Seniors.
MSD's recent report identifying service gaps highlighted a number of gaps for older people related to workforce capability, holistic services, sexual violence services, emergency accommodation and tailored services. See more details in the full report, A report outlining family violence and sexual violence service gaps in Aotearoa (2024).
Professor Edwina Pio recently completed research on the experiences of ageing Asians in Auckland | Tāmaki Makaurau. The research involved focus groups with people who were over 65 who identified with Chinese, Indian or Korean ethnicity. It also involved interviews with managers who work with older people. The research findings focus on the joys and vulnerabilities of this cohort of ageing Asians, framed under the concept of belonging. One of the 5 key themes that emerged from the focus groups and interviews was elder abuse. More detailed findings from the research have been published in the report, Belonging as an Ageing Asian (2024), funded by the Selwyn Foundation.
Hohou te Rongo Kahukura – Outing Violence and Rainbow Hub Waikato explored Takatāpui and Rainbow elders' experiences through a combination of focus groups, interviews and an online survey. The research was focused on identifying any specific risks of elder abuse, neglect and exploitation and advocating for meaningful inclusion of the needs of Takatāpui and Rainbow older people in strategies, policies and services for older people in Aotearoa. Fact sheets, podcasts and a report share the research findings. The in-depth report, Uplifting Takatāpui and Rainbow Elder Voices: Tukua kia tū takitahi ngā whetū o te rangi (2023), highlighted how many Takatāpui and Rainbow elders struggled to balance safety and isolation due to the impacts of multiple and compounding forms of mistreatment and discrimination from racism, heterosexism and colonisation; state violence; and abuse, exclusion, denial and violence from family members.
Researcher Kate Diesfield authored the book chapter Who do we turn to? Safeguarding residents in aged care settings from abuse and neglect in New Zealand (2023). It looks at the protections available to promote older people’s safety in residential settings considering institutional care, domestic and international safeguards.
For more research and reports from Aotearoa, see this custom search of our library database for older women, older people or elder abuse.
International research and initiatives
WHO published the briefing note Violence against women 60 years and older: Data availability, methodological issues and recommendations for good practice (2024). The briefing note is part of a WHO series focused on strengthening the measurement and data collection of violence against particular groups of women or specific aspects of violence against women. WHO also shared a database of promising interventions to prevent and respond to abuse of older people.
WHO, UN agencies and the International Network for the Prevention of Elder Abuse hosted a webinar this year that looked at global progress and priorities for ending abuse of older people. In the webinar, a panel discussed progress over the last 2 years to address the United Nations Decade of Healthy Ageing (2021–2030) 5 priorities identified to tackle abuse of older people.
A number of research projects have been undertaken in Australia states related to abuse of older people. Publications from this research include:
- Informing strategies to prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of adults with disability and older people by carers (2024)
- Everyone's business: research into the responses to abuse of older people (elder abuse) in Western Australia (2023)
- Research into the mistreatment of older Aboriginal Australians (2022)
See our library for more international reports and research on older women, older people or elder abuse.
Related media
Call for change in elder abuse criteria, Otago Daily Times, 11.07.2024
Rise in financial elder abuse cases partly due to tough economic times, RNZ, 08.07.2024
Elder abuse can be close to home, Hawkes Bay Today, 24.06.2024
How and when to discuss the tough topics with ageing relatives, RNZ, 19.06.2024
New resources for kaumatua, Waatea News, 19.06.2024 (also see the full interview with Rangimahora Reddy | Chief Executive Rauawaawa Kaumatua Charitable CEO)
Elder abuse; scamming and grooming the vulnerable, NZ Herald, 19.06.2024
Elder abuse - what you need to know, NZ Police news, 14.06.2024
Spotlight on protecting our elders, Otago Daily Times, 13.06.2024
Te Piere Warahi: ‘73 with a PhD’, Waatea News, 09.05.2024
Care for New Zealand’s seniors branded a human rights crisis, Stuff, 20.04.2024
Old people financially abused as young ones run out of cash, Waikato Times, 25.03.2024
Elder Abuse w/ Hanny Naus: November 29th, 2023, b95FM, 29.11.2023
Online misogyny and violent extremism report
Te Mana Whakaatu | the Classification Office has published new research about online misogyny and violent extremism in Aotearoa. The research looked at Aotearoa and international research, the work of the Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) team at the Classification Office and case studies of content on fringe platforms.
The Classification office published the research through the in-depth online report Online Misogyny and Violent Extremism: Understanding the Landscape (2024). They have also published a downloadable Summary Report - Online Misogyny and Violent Extremism Understanding the Landscape (2024).
The online report provides a comprehensive overview of what is known about the links between online misogyny and violent extremism in Aotearoa and how that relates internationally. It covers 5 areas:
- misogyny and violent extremism (including male supremacy, incel, and violent extremism ideologies that overlap)
- the role of technology and online platforms
- intersectionality and misogyny
- online abuse and harassment of women and girls
- government responses.
In each area there are references and suggestions for further reading. The summary report provides a briefer high level overview of key findings, gaps and potential responses.
The media release highlighted 3 key findings from the research:
- "The threats posed by incel (involuntary celibate) ideology, along with other misogynistic and male supremacist ideologies, is becoming more widely recognised.
- New trends in extremist beliefs are emerging, particularly among boys and young men. These include individuals adopting mixed and unstable beliefs as well as some who are not tied to any specific ideology but are drawn solely to violence itself.
- Algorithms amplify misogynistic and extremist content, making it easier for vulnerable people to encounter and possibly adopt more extreme ideologies."
Additional findings and trends from the research include:
- girls and women are more likely to experience online violence including more severe violence and gender-based violence, and this spans a continuum across online and offline violence
- people with intersecting identities experience intensified harm from combined experiences of misogyny with other forms of discrimination and hate including racism, religious bigotry, antisemitism, Islamophobia, sectarianism, transphobia, homophobia, and ableism
- changes in technology including AI-generated deepfake images are enabling new forms of online violence and new tools for people who use violence
- gendered disinformation is increasing with significant impacts to girls and women in leadership including journalists, political leaders and public figures
- extremist misogynistic beliefs often intertwine with other beliefs including racism, anti-government conspiracy theories, anti-immigrant and anti-LGBTIQ+ beliefs
- a growing trend of individuals who do not adhere to one ideology, noting "The lack of a clearly defined incel community in New Zealand seems to lead many individuals towards (white) Identity-Motivated Violent Extremism" (see Section 2.1 Misogyny and violent extremism - Male supremacy and inceldom in the online report)
- international research shows a significant correlation between hostile sexism, support for extremist ideologies and domestic violence
- there can be crossover online between extremist and misogynist groups and online child sexual abuse and exploitation.
The research also looks at how governments from other countries have responded to online misogyny. This includes regulatory frameworks, changes to hate offences and classifying misogynistic extremist ideologies as violent extremism. The research also looked at responses from technology platforms.
The research was prompted by trends the Classification Office had observed in their work. Chief Censor Caroline Flora said:
"Through our daily classification work we saw a common thread of misogyny in the propaganda of extremists who had committed mass violence and murder. This research exercise deepened our concern: misogyny online is pervasive; it is threatening, and it is harmful."
She also commented on one of the gaps identified in the research saying:
"There are no standard methods for collecting and analysing data on online misogyny across government agencies and NGOs."
Responding to the report and online resource, Te Kāhui Tika Tangata Human Rights Commission wrote:
"It’s clear that action and safeguards to promote and protect the human rights of all people to access the internet without being subjected to harm or discrimination are needed."
Related news
In May 2024 Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden announced that Te Tari Taiwhenua | Department of Internal Affairs would not be progressing further work on the Safer Online Services and Media Platforms. In response to the news, Vivien Maidaborn, tumu whakarae | chief executive of InternetNZ, wrote an op ed on how internet regulation is urgently needed.
The purpose of the Safer Online Services and Media Platforms work was to improve the regulation of online services and media platforms. The goal was to improve safety for all New Zealanders, with a particular focus on minimising content harms for children and young people, including online child exploitation and other forms of online violence. This work involved a public consultation. You can read our submission for that consultation and see a recording from a webinar we hosted and related resources.
Te Kāhui Tika Tangata | Human Rights Commission published the independent report, How to improve the Aotearoa New Zealand Code of Practice for Online Safety and Harms? in December 2023. The report looks at how the Code of Practice could be improved to address Te Tiriti and human rights. The Code is a voluntary code signed by Meta (Facebook and Instagram), Google (including YouTube), Tiktok, Twitch, and Twitter (now X) to guide how these tech companies manage online harm in Aotearoa. Anjum Rahman, Founder and Project Co-Lead of Inclusive Aotearoa Collective Tāhono, spoke with radio 531pi about the report and issues with the Code. Aliya 'Allyn' Danzeisen, National Coordinator for Islamic Women's Council New Zealand, was recently interviewed about digital responsibility and the part the government needs to play.
The 2023 report from the World Internet Project (NZ) found that 61% of people believed social media companies should be more strongly regulated than they are now. See media outlet The Press's article Most Kiwis spending at least 5 hours a day online but trust in social media low.
Related media
Internal Affairs job cuts will lead to more Kiwis being scammed online, union says, RNZ, 19.06.2024
Dozens more jobs axed at Department of Internal Affairs, Stuff, 19.06.2024
CHAT: Minister refuses to guarantee jobs in child exploitation area, Duncan Garner, 19.06.2024
30,000 websites to be blocked over child sex abuse material, RNZ, 19.06.2024
Improvements to stopping Digital Child Exploitation, Beehive media release, 18.06.2024
Terrorism and violent extremism research funding cut by two-thirds, RNZ, 05.06.2024
Media oversight one-stop-shop stopped, RNZ, 19.05.2024
Alarm bells sound over online misogyny, extremist content, One News, 13.05.2024
Government swerves away from tackling online ‘industrial-grade’ violence, The Post, 12.05.2024
Internal Affairs scraps ambitious plan to clean up the internet, The Post, 10.05.2024
Abuse of MPs increased to 98% in 2022 - study, RNZ, 17.04.2024
The rise and rise of intolerance in the online world, The Press, 29.03.2024
Regulation needed for online media giants, Waatea News, 30.11.2023
Indigenous women share racist online experiences at conference, Te Karere TVNZ, 29.10.2023
Amokura Panoho | Member of Te Pūkotahitanga, Waatea News, 25.10.2023
The harsh and unregulated reality of online safety for indigenous women, NZ Herald, 25.10.2023
'Rampant' increase of digital harm on indigenous women, conference told, Stuff, 25.10.2023
Call for proposals for TOAH-NNEST conference
Te Ōhaakii ā Hine – National Network for Ending Sexual Violence Together (TOAH-NNEST) is inviting proposals for presentations and workshops for the bi-annual National Sexual Violence Conference.
Proposals are due by 20 June 2024. This date has been extended from the original date in the call for proposals.
The conference will be held in Christchurch from 19-20 November 2024. The theme of the conference “Te Tāmata Tipu” is about restoring growth and vitality. The TOAH-NNEST call for proposals explains:
"Tāmata is to cultivate and work the soil and tipu is the seedling. Te Tāmata Tipu is about creating the conditions for the seedlings to grow again and prosper. There have been some challenging conditions, and it is imperative to ensure the soils are right for them to grow and thrive. This theme was gifted to us by Dr Eruera Tarena (Ngāi Tahu, Ngāti Porou, Te Whānau-ā-Apanui)."
The conference aims to bring together people working in mahi tūkino | sexual violence to build relationships, workshop, share knowledge and learn. People working in sexual violence, academics, researchers, practitioners, educators, activists, and policy makers are invited to submit proposals.
The call for proposals notes that TOAH-NNEST is seeking "...proposals that include an understanding of Te Ao Māori and reflect the diversity of those impacted by mahi tūkino. We are looking for exciting and inspiring ideas, collaborative approaches, and responses to ending mahi tūkino, prevention, healing, justice, and community leadership among Māori and Tauiwi."
For questions contact TOAH-NNEST at svconference2024@toah-nnest.org.nz.
Symposium on rough sex, choking and strangulation
Medical Sexual Assault Clinicians Aotearoa (MEDSAC) are facilitating and hosting a national, cross-sector, ‘Rough Sex’/'Choking'/Strangulation Symposium in Te Whanga-nui-a-Tara | Wellington on 29 November 2024. MEDSAC is facilitating the symposium with a rōpū including Nikki Denholm, Samantha Keene, Nicola Gavey and Melanie Beres. Details for the symposium are still be finalised. For questions or to stay up to date on the symposium, contact admin@medsac.org.nz.
Budget 2024
In announcing the Budget, the Government emphasised tax relief through savings from the public sector, and funding for frontline services in health, education and law and order, with Prime Minister Christopher Luxon saying:
"By identifying billions of dollars of lower-value spending across the public sector, we have both been able to deliver meaningful tax relief to support Kiwis with the cost of living and invest in key frontline services like healthcare, schools, and the Police.”
In her Budget speech, Finance Minister Nicola Willis said:
"Ministers and their departments have gone line by line through the spending areas they are responsible for. This scrutiny has resulted in more than 240 savings initiatives. Some amount to a few hundred thousand dollars a year, while others save tens of millions. Some reduce the amount of funding available for a particular activity, while others stop things completely."
The Budget 2024 Summary of Initiatives provides a complete list by vote of initiatives that includes 3 types of funding: 1) increased funding for existing initiatives, 2) new funding and 3) savings through of return existing funding.
Additional detail can be found in estimates by Departments and Offices of Parliament Administering Votes. For example see:
- Vote Justice which includes funding related to Te Puna Aonui under the Ministry of Justice estimates.
- Vote Social Development which includes funding related to services for victims and perpetrators of family violence and sexual violence, and work actioned under Te Aorerekura.
- Vote Oranga Tamariki.
The key items below are drawn from the Summary of Initiatives.
New or increased funding:
New or increased funding related to the family violence and sexual violence sector includes:
- Oranga Tamariki - new funding to address serious youth offending through "a new legislative category in the Oranga Tamariki Act 1989 and a military-style academy pilot"; new funding to continue the Fast Track Youth Offending programme and expand it to 14 to 17 year-olds; new funding to upgrade case and care management digital systems; increased funding for the Crown Response Unit to enable the Crown to respond to the Abuse in Care Royal Commission of Inquiry final report and recommendations; increased funding to cover increased demand and costs for High Needs Children Services that provides specialised caregiving services for disabled children and young people with high support needs in Oranga Tamariki’s care; increased funding to address remuneration for frontline staff.
- Historical claims of abuse in care - 2 years of time-limited funding to enable the Ministry of Social Development to resolve a further 2,000 claims of historic abuse of people in care.
- Disability Support Services - $1.1 billion for Whaikaha — Ministry of Disabled People for continued support to disabled people and their families.
- Te Ao Mārama programme - funding to potentially expand the programme to additional sites but initially held "...in contingency while the Ministry of Justice focuses on the implementation of the programme in existing sites and gathers information about effectiveness".
- Mental Health and Addiction Community Sector Innovation Fund - funding for a national Mental Health and Addiction Community Sector Innovation Fund for community organisations to apply for funding of innovative time-limited approaches to address mental health and wellbeing needs.
- Financial grants to victims of serious crime - operating funding to increase financial grants to victims of serious crime.
- Police - one year of time-limited funding to address cost pressures and previously announced additional frontline police.
- Corrections - previously announced increased funding for frontline staff and expanding prison capacity; new funding held in contingency to extend access to rehabilitation programmes for remand prisoners (the Summary of Initiatives notes "The funding will be drawn down pending a comprehensive review of rehabilitation services and an implementation plan based on this review.").
- Courts - previously announced funding for Courts to implement the reintroduction of the 3 strikes regime to sentencing and to implement the "the Government’s crackdown on gangs" - this includes "...banning of gang insignia in public places, greater powers to stop gangs associating and giving greater weight to gang membership at sentencing".
- Social investment approach - previously announced funding to implement a social investment approach, to establish the Social Investment Fund, to establish a new Social Investment Agency, and to "...support devolution of social services to regional partners and support better use of government administrative data".
- Social housing - previously announced funding for 1,500 social housing places to be provided through Community Housing Providers.
For more information see the government media releases below.
Savings through return of existing funding:
There is limited detail about the cost savings in the Summary of Initiatives. It often refers to improving efficiencies, reducing workforce or unused contingency funds without identifying specific areas of work that will be affected. It does not necessarily reflect stopping or discontinuing services, unless specifically stated. Again, some detail can be found in the estimates by Departments and Offices of Parliament Administering Votes.
For example, under the Justice Vote, it notes a savings of $461,000 over 4 years related to the Prevention of Family Violence and Sexual Violence (page 62). Other areas of savings in the Justice Vote include the Criminal Cases Review Commission, Human Rights Commission, Justice Sector Directorate, Legal Aid, the Mana Ōrite Agreement between the Justice Sector Leadership Board and Ināia Tonu Nei, and the victims of crime improving outcomes operating model.
In the Oranga Tamariki Vote it notes $120 million in cost savings over 4 years from "Contracting Service Costs" and states:
"This savings initiative returns funding from contracts with third-party providers. These will be drawn from under-utilised services and fee-for-service arrangements, which will be replaced by more efficient and consistent formal arrangements. This initiative improves the efficiency of service delivery, with no reduction in frontline services."
Savings at the Ministry for Women included rescoping the policy work programme, stating:
"This savings initiative returns funding by reducing the scope of the existing policy work programme to align with Government priorities. It includes reducing investment on in-house data and insights capability, reducing contributions to the Public Service Commission’s Equal Pay Taskforce and reducing expenditure on the refresh of the Bringing Gender In tool."
Other areas related to the sector where savings are identified include Crown Law Office workforce, Crown Prosecution Service, closure of the Government Centre for Dispute Resolution, research funds (for example Marsden and Health Research), Court and Coronial Services Initiatives (including Court interpreters), the Ministry of Justice Cultural Capability programme, initiatives related to emergency housing and Rangatahi Youth Transitional Housing, the National Centre of Research Excellence for Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism, closure of the Ministry of Social Development's Community Innovation Fund, discontinuation of the Living in Aotearoa Survey, and Workforce Development Councils.
The Summary of Initiatives also includes the list of savings by department across all government departments under the Government's initiative requiring agencies to identify either a 6.5% or 7.5% savings. The Executive Board for the Elimination of Family Violence and Sexual Violence identified $1.3 million operating annual average savings across 5 years to reach the 6.5% target, but Table 4 of the Summary of Initiatives shows there is no baseline reduction. Media outlet Stuff reported that these cuts would not be going ahead.
Also see our previous news story identifying potential impacts from budget cuts for government agencies.
Government media releases related to Budget 2024
- Budget Update: Pacific Peoples, Ministry for Pacific Peoples news, 31.05.2024
- Budget investment in disability welcomed, Whaikaha — Ministry of Disabled People news, 30.05.2024
- Budget 2024, Ministry of Social Development Media Release, 30.05.2024
- Ministry of Justice - Budget 2024, Ministry of Justice News, 30.05.2024
- $1.1 billion investment to support disabled people, Beehive Media Release, 30.05.2024 (see the related Budget 2024 Fact Sheet on funding for Whaikaha)
- 500 more Police to improve public safety, Beehive Media Release, 30.05.2024
- Budget backs Police on the front line, Beehive Media Release, 30.05.2024 (see the related Budget 2024 Fact Sheet on funding for Police)
- Budget assures funding for Te Matatini, Beehive Media Release, 30.05.2024
- New social housing places to support families into homes, Beehive Media Release, 24.05.2024
- Government invests in 1,500 more social homes, Beehive Media Release, 22.05.2024
- $24 million boost for Gumboot Friday, Beehive Media Release, 22.05.2024
- Minister welcomes Police gang unit, Beehive Media Release, 14.05.2024
- Accelerating Social Investment, Beehive Media Release, 09.05.2024
- $1.9 billion investment to keep NZ safe from crime, Beehive Media Release, 06.05.2024
Community and advocate responses
Advocates and sector representatives have raised concerns about the impacts of the savings cuts and the focus of funding in Budget 2024:
Social Service Providers Te Pai Ora o Aotearoa (Te Pai Ora SSPA) said "...it does not see a clear direction for community-based social service providers around Aotearoa New Zealand in Budget 2024." Te Pai Ora SSPA Chief Executive Belinda Himiona said:
"The reduction in funding for contracting through Oranga Tamariki in effect sets a savings target but we have not seen a reduction in the need for these services. We need to know the extent of funding decreases to understand the impact this will have on frontline services for families, communities and providers."
She also said:
"Critical to the success of community-based social services is a well-paid and valued workforce. It is disappointing that even after the social worker pay equity settlement and extension process, we again see our workforce undervalued and not given a pay increase equivalent to the Oranga Tamariki staffing increase signaled in this Budget."
Hui E Community Aotearoa highlighted how the budget cuts will impact the tangata whenua, community and voluntary sector:
"Funds that communities have been able to access in the wake of COVID-19 and climate emergency events have fallen off a cliff, such as the end of the $35 million cultural sector COVID-19 funding and a $30 million decrease in funding for Community Connection services, despite organisations reporting high levels of continued need.
Less visible are the ripples out to small organisations and groups that will be competing for reduced funding at the same time as facing this increased need. Community sport programmes, community-led development, budgeting services and community-based justice services are some of those affected. The Māori Development Fund has been cut by more than half and across Community Support Services the non-renewal of contracts expiring in June this year foreshadows further cuts.
Cuts to the public sector mean reductions in roles and capacity to engage with the tangata whenua, community and voluntary sector, and the inclusion of community voice in decision-making. Also notable is reduced funding to lift procurement capability across the public sector. Complex application and monitoring processes have been a long-term bugbear of community organisations."
Te Kāhui Tika Tangata Human Rights Commission raised many concerns about lack of funding and cuts to government agencies noting a lack of funding for Māori development, lack of support for Rainbow Communities, not renewing dedicated funding and support for families affected by the March 15 terror attacks in Christchurch, and impacts from reduced funding to Te Puni Kōkiri, the Ministry for Pacific Peoples and the Ministry for Ethnic Communities. Acting Chief Human Rights Commissioner Dr Saunoamaali’i Karanina Sumeo said:
“We encourage the Government to commit to te Tiriti o Waitangi and human rights and prioritise investment in communities already living with poor health, social, economic, education and criminal justice outcomes.”
Julia Whaipooti, Te Kāhui Tika Tangata Human Rights Commission's tatau urutahi | shared leader, wrote an op ed for RNZ, Budget 2024 does not fulfil te Tiriti obligations. See further information in the related media about how the Budget fails to meet the needs of Māori.
New Zealand Disability Support Network CEO Peter Reynolds said:
"We see the $1.1 billion allocated in the Budget to ‘address demand’ as code for meeting growth or inflation costs only. No-one’s support quality or availability will increase. It sounds like a lot of money but unfortunately it won’t cover providers’ cost increases for very long."
The Child Poverty Action Group raised concerns about how the Budget would contribute to rising child poverty, and fails to meet the financial needs for disability services. For more information see the Government's Child Poverty Report 2024, included in Budget 2024.
The New Zealand Law Society's overview of Budget 2024 for the legal profession highlights concerns with legal aid and future changes to youth offending, among other issues.
Update: UNICEF Aotearoa acting CEO Laura Bond said:
"Every day, across Aotearoa, children and young people are looking for opportunities to have a say in their own futures. The Government has obligations as a signatory to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child to ensure they listen to children, their needs are met and their rights are upheld."
"The Government showed its hand in this Budget, leaving children and young people out. It risks falling short of its obligations to children and young people. Now is the time for our leaders to engage with the youth of Aotearoa as a matter of urgency."
See further criticisms and commentary in the related media below.
Related research
Researchers from the UK interviewed leaders in the specialist sexual violence sector about their experiences with funding and commissioning as part of a 3 year research project. Their article outlines how funding and commissioning dynamics push individuals to the edge of service sustainability, job satisfaction, and emotional well-being. They highlight that too frequently funding and commissioning frameworks don't work in ways that sustain sexual violence services. They advocate for:
"...commissioners and funders to make it easier for SVSSV services, including minoritized women services, to work in partnership to build capacity and strengthen structures for referral and multiagency working. Such approaches would serve to promote unity over competition, collaboration in the envisaging of new approaches to service sustainability and exploration of formal partnership/consortia working to expand the size, scope, reach, intersectional approach, and voice of specialist provision."
Read the full article Working the Edge: The Emotional Experiences of Commissioning and Funding Arrangements for Service Leaders in the Sexual Violence Voluntary Sector (2024) published in the Viole
Te Puna Aonui and ACC workforce survey open
Te Puna Aonui and ACC are inviting people to give feedback through the Agents of Change Survey.
The online survey is open until 17 June 2024 21 June 2024.
The survey is for anyone working to prevent and respond to family violence and sexual violence in Aotearoa. This includes people who contribute to individual and community wellbeing and equity. It also includes people who may not work directly in violence, but come into contact with people experiencing violence or harmful behaviours.
The purpose of the survey is to better understand who is working in family violence and sexual violence, and what is needed to strengthen the workforce.
The survey asks questions about your work, training, capabilities, and demographic questions. You may also get questions about the systems designed to prevent violence and harm. The survey should take 15 to 25 minutes.
Verian (formerly Kantar Public) is helping run the survey – this includes securely collecting and processing the survey responses. Verian is an independent research company.
To learn more about the survey see the survey Frequently Asked Questions.
If you have questions or would like help filling out the survey, contact Te Puna Aonui at relationships@tepunaaonui.govt.nz.
Related news
He Whare Wāhine through Te Rau Ora are running a survey for kaimahi Māori to share feedback through a national workforce development survey. The survey is designed for Kaimahi Māori working with whānau living with violence or working in the family violence and sexual violence sectors. Te Rau Ora was commissioned by Te Pūkotahitanga, the Tangata Whenua Ministerial Advisory Group, to gather insights from kaimahi Māori about workforce development. Te Rau Ora is researching ways to understand and strengthen the family violence and sexual violence workforce in Aotearoa. This survey is open until 30 June 2024. This is a separate survey from the Agents of Change Survey. Kaimahi Māori are encouraged to fill out both surveys. Learn more in our news story Survey and consultation for kaimahi Māori.
The Ministry of Social Development has published A report outlining family violence and sexual violence service gaps in Aotearoa (2024) on the Te Puna Aonui website. The report outlines gaps in family violence and sexual violence services. It also outlines a potential approach to address those gaps. This work is part of addressing Actions 29 and 30 of Te Aorerekura Action Plan, and involved public consultation to identify service gaps in March - May 2023. The report identifies gaps in 5 broad areas:
- family violence and sexual violence workforce capability
- gaps in holistic services (identified as "whānau-centred, wrap-around support from early intervention to long term health")
- sexual violence service gaps
- gaps in accessibility of safe houses and availability of emergency accommodation
- expanding and developing tailored services to meet the needs of tangata whenua and people from diverse communities.

This is part 1 of a 3-part series that provides an overview and background related to section 7AA, and the care and protection system in Aotearoa. Part 2 looks at Oranga Tamariki Act section 7AA and Iwi partnerships. Part 3 looks at Child care and protection in Aotearoa: history of institutional racism and calls for transformation.
Legislation introduced to repeal Oranga Tamariki Act section 7AA, Submissions open
Minister for Children, Karen Chhour, introduced the legislation, Oranga Tamariki (Repeal of Section 7AA) Amendment Bill on 12 May 2024.
Submissions are open on the legislation. They are due by 3 July 2024.
In announcing the legislation, Minister Chhour said "Removing s7AA from the Act reinforces the need to put the safety of the child first." She also said:
"I have indicated to Oranga Tamariki that existing strategic partnerships with iwi and Māori organisations will continue, and the repeal would not prevent Oranga Tamariki from entering into further strategic partnership agreements with iwi or Māori organisations."
The legislation has passed the first reading and been referred to select committee. In Minister Chhour's speech for the first reading she said:
"During my time in Opposition and before coming to Parliament, I heard devastating stories about how some Oranga Tamariki staff prioritized cultural considerations and the desires of the child’s family over the individual needs of the child.
This sometimes led to unsafe care decisions and disruption for children and caregivers."
The Oranga Tamariki Regulatory Impact Statement for the repeal of section 7AA has been published. It highlights "...a lack of robust evidence to support the view that section 7AA causes harmful changes to long-term care arrangements." Specifically, the paper states:
"There is no empirical evidence to support the notion that section 7AA has driven practice decisions that have led to changing care arrangements. We have heard anecdotal concerns from a small number of caregivers that care decisions are more strongly influenced by cultural factors, than by the immediate safety of children. There is, however, no evidence to suggest that these concerns are related to the duties outlined in section 7AA. Some concerned stakeholders and advocates have expressed the view that section 7AA was responsible for previous, high-profile changes to care arrangements. Again, we do not have evidence as to whether section 7AA explicitly influenced these care decisions, but internal evaluation suggests that it did not."
It further states:
"While some practice decisions have been made that, in hindsight, have not resulted in the best outcome for the child, it is important to reiterate that there is no evidence to suggest these resulted from the duties outlined in section 7AA."
The paper recommends retaining section 7AA and strengthening practice:
"The Department [Oranga Tamariki] considers that a full or partial repeal of section 7AA will not address the policy problem. This paper recommends retaining section 7AA while continuing to strengthen practice and operational guidelines to fulfil the policy objectives and best address the Government's concerns."
Te Pāti Māori has launched a petition to stop the repeal of section 7AA.
Update: See our submission, New Zealand Family Violence Clearinghouse submission on the Oranga Tamariki (Repeal of Section 7AA) Amendment Bill.
Background on 7AA
Section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act sets out specific duties for the chief executive to recognise and provide a practical commitment to the principles of te Tiriti o Waitangi (see section 7aa in the legislation). These include:
- setting measurable outcomes for Māori children and young persons who come to the attention of the Ministry
- having regard to mana tamaiti (tamariki) and the whakapapa of Māori children and young persons and the whanaungatanga responsibilities of their whānau, hapū, and iwi
- seeking to develop strategic partnerships with iwi and Māori organisations, including iwi authorities
- reporting annually on the Ministry's progress and next steps.
A key purpose of section 7AA was to reduce the disproportionate number of Māori children and young people taken into the care and protection system, and to improve outcomes for those children and young people already in care.
Section 7AA was added to the Oranga Tamariki Act through amendments in the Children, Young Persons, and Their Families (Oranga Tamariki) Legislation Act 2017. Section 7AA came into force in July 2019.
While the Waitangi Tribunal has previously found that section 7AA does not implement the full recommendations of Pūao-te-ata-tū nor meet the full obligations of Te Tiriti — this is the first time that the principles of Te Tiriti have been mentioned in New Zealand's child protection legislation. And the Iwi partnerships that have gained resources and authority through 7AA to care for their tamariki and whānau are having significant impacts. For more information see our related stories below.
Waitangi tribunal report on proposed repeal of Oranga Tamariki Act section 7AA
The Waitangi Tribunal released the final report on the urgent inquiry into the government’s proposal to repeal section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act on 10 May 2024. The Tribunal had initially released an interim report on 29 April 2024.
In the final report, the Waitangi Tribunal identified breaches of the Treaty, stating:
"We have found clear breaches of the Treaty article 2 guarantee to Māori of tino rangatiratanga over kainga and of the Treaty principles of partnership and active protection. We have also found that prejudice will arise from the rushed and arbitrary repeal of section 7AA, not only due to the failure to fully analyse likely downstream effects but more importantly due to the significant risk of actual harm to vulnerable tamariki and the risk of erosion of trust amongst Māori whānau and communities." (see final report section 1.9.5)
The Tribunal also recommended "...that the repeal of section 7AA be stopped" to allow the Minister to review and report on the legislation, government policy and related arrangements, as outlined in section 448B of the Oranga Tamariki Act. Under this section of the legislation, this would be required by 1 July 2025.
In the opening letter to the final report, the Tribunal stated:
"We agree entirely with the views of senior officials that a policy change of such significance must rely on evidence and not on anecdotal stories, hearsay, and ideological positions. It should also be informed by community consultation, and in particular consultation with the iwi and Māori organisations that have established strategic agreements with the Chief Executive pursuant to section 7AA."
The Tribunal recommended that as a first step for review of the legislation, that the Crown talk with section 7AA strategic partners and Māori post-settlement entities.
Further, the Tribunal recommended that the legislative review consider the recommendations set out in Appendix 3 of the Tribunal's 2021 report, He Pāharakeke, He Rito Whakakīkinga Whāruarua related to inquiry WAI 295.
Finally, the Tribunal recommended that the requirements of section 7AA to develop strategic partnerships with iwi and Māori organisations and to focus on the reduction of disparities by setting and publicly reporting on expectations and targets, be retained.
During the inquiry, the Waitangi Tribunal summoned Minister for Children Karen Chhour to provide evidence. However, the Crown notified the Tribunal that the Minister would not appear as a witness nor produce a written statement. The Crown also asked for a review of the Tribunal's summons in the High Court, who set aside the summons. However, the case was considered by the Court of Appeal who upheld the appeal and found that it is within the Tribunal's powers to issue summons to the Minister (see Case number[2024] NZCA 160 and the related media release).
See related media below for responses from Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Minister Karen Chhour.
Responses from tangata whenua and tauiwi advocates
VOYCE – Whakarongo Mai and the Pou Tangata Oranga Tamariki Iwi Leaders Group (ILG) and the National Iwi Chairs Forum oppose the repeal of section 7AA. Many Māori, people with lived experience of state care, advocates and researchers have criticised the proposal to repeal section 7AA since the proposal was first raised in 2023.
Long-time advocate and state care survivor, Paora Moyle (Ngāti Porou) said in an interview with Waatea news:
"...the number one recommendation that the Abuse in Care Royal Commission report says that harms our babies is the lack of reporting, the lack of truth coming to the fore. And you've got thousands and thousands of people that have come forward with their testimony, and now there's irrefutable proof that child protection in this country has been very, very lax. In fact, it's targeted our babies and taken them away from their whakapapa. That has caused intergenerational harms.
This government is responsible for addressing that. It is not. It is actually making it worse. It's taking away the protections. It's taken away the voices."
In a Spinoff article, legal academic Luke Fitzmaurice-Brown (Te Aupōuri, Pākehā) wrote:
"What the new government is proposing is highly regressive and very likely to cause harm to Māori children and families. Section 7AA is not in the law as an empty gesture, it is there because upholding Te Tiriti in relation to child protection could significantly improve outcomes for Māori whānau. Upholding Te Tiriti is also the Crown’s most central constitutional obligation, and they cannot just legislate that responsibility away."
And
"As an advocate for a decolonised child protection system, I am given hope by that unwavering willingness in communities to oppose regressive reforms. But what also gives me hope is that far from just beginning, the decolonisation of the child protection system is well under way. Across the country, Māori have been rebuilding the capacity to care for our own for decades now. Sometimes it has been led by iwi, sometimes by organisations like the Māori Women’s Welfare League, and other times it has been individual aunties and nannies who are fiercely determined to ensure that not one more Māori baby be taken by the state. Section 7AA has often helped, but the decolonisation of the child protection system started before that provision existed, and it won’t just stop if it is repealed."
Also see Luke's additional article in the Spinoff: The Waitangi Tribunal’s latest report is about far more than just child protection.
Activist and social work academic Kerri Cleaver (Kāi Tahu) wrote:
"In 2020, I set up our Kāi Tahu service which, under 7AA, delivers the caregiver functions of Oranga Tamariki for mokopuna Kāi Tahu who are in the state system. Through the design and set-up process with our community, we heard of an overwhelming desire for a “by Kāi Tahu, for Kāi Tahu, of Kāi Tahu” service.
Our current offering, called Te Kaika, was only made possible by our iwi partnership with the Crown under 7AA. It is a minimal, substandard demonstration of giving effect to Te Tiriti o Waitangi, but it’s what we’ve been given."
And
"That the government wants to repeal 7AA speaks to their position that Māori don’t have a right to design and deliver in the existing system. It suggests that the government doesn’t feel required to report on, and account for, Māori children. It rips the rug away from under us, when the rug has only just been laid."
Social work academic Emily Keddell wrote:
"Getting rid of the partnerships and measuring disparities absolves the government of recognising inequalities or pursuing a Tiriti-based solution. Without this, Oranga Tamariki is re-positioned as the ones with all the answers and all the power. That has not worked so far."
Several claimants for the Tribunal inquiry into the proposed repeal of section 7AA have also commented:
Dr Hope Tupara (Ngā Pōtiki ā Tamapahore, Ngāi Te Rangi, Ngāi Tāmanuhiri, Rongowhakaata, Te Roroa), National President of Māori Women's Welfare League said in an interview with Waatea News:
"We have a really good opportunity in our country to show the rest of the world how we can create a system – Te Tiriti offers that to us – to be able to provide for something different that shares power."
Rahera Ohia, representative from Ngāti Pukenga also a claimant for the Tribunal inquiry, said:
"The empirical evidence that's been gathered over years, you know, since Pūao-te-ata-tū, essentially indicates that Māori children need to know where they come from, who they are, who they can rely on. And without 7AA, there's no assurance that Oranga Tamariki will take that into account."
Also see further criticisms and concerns from:
- Waikato-Tainui chairperson Tukoroirangi Morgan and Chief Children's Commissioner Dr Claire Achmad in the Stuff article Iwi to fight 'Crown stupidity' repeal of Oranga Tamariki legislation
- Tina Ngata (Ngati Porou) in the Waatea News article Racist myths driving 7AA repeal
- Aaron Smale (Ngati Porou) in his Newsroom article The Crown versus Māori Children
- Tupua Urlich (Ngāti Kahungunu) in the NZ Herald article State abuse survivor urges against repealing Oranga Tamariki Treaty commitments and in the NZ Herald article Oranga Tamariki Act: Karen Chhour’s is not the only voice that needs to be heard on state care and abuse
- Margaret Mutu (Ngāti Kahu, Te Rarawa, Ngāti Whātua) in an interview with Te Hiku Media - Repeal of 7AA Causes Outrage for Many
- Zoe Witika-Hawke (Ngāti Hako, Ngāti Paoa, Ngāti Pākehā) in an interview with Pacific Media Network
- Annette Sykes (Te Arawa, Ngāti Makino, Ngāti Pikiao) in an interview with Waatea News
- Tā Mark Solomon (Ngāi Tahu, Ngāti Kurī), Chair of the Oranga Tamariki Advisory Board, in an interview with Waatea News
- Ngahiwi Tomoana (Ngāti Kahungunu, Ngāti Hawea, Ngāti Hori and Samoa) and Shayne Walker (Kai Tahu, Ngāti Kahungunu), in comments to Te Karere TVNZ New Minister of Children under fire following law scrap.
Many more responses raising similar criticisms are in the related media below.
Related news
The Supreme Court of Canada has

No results found.
Please try different keywords or filter options.