He pitopito kōrero
News
News stories

Minister for ACC Carmel Sepuloni announced the funding investment noting that the sexual violence primary prevention system would focus on more than just violence, including the whole community and addressing the social drivers that allow sexual violence to occur.
She said the system would focus on communities most impacted by violence and gaps in the current response, including Māori, Pasifika, disabled, rainbow, ethnic and migrant communities, and older New Zealanders. The system would include a range of initiatives, including education, workforce development, community mobilisation and behaviour change.
Minister Sepuloni said "The new Te-Tiriti-informed primary prevention system announced today, will provide long-term, sustained investment and enhance our Government’s effort to prevent sexual violence. The package includes $11.715 million of targeted investment for kaupapa Māori approaches."
Minister for the Prevention of Family and Sexual Violence Marama Davidson said "The approach being taken by ACC, aligns with the wider kaupapa of the Joint Venture and soon to be released National Strategy, which recognises that we cannot eliminate violence if we focus solely on response. This is why we are working with communities to develop prevention and healing components to stop violence from happening in the first place.”
Tender for Strategic Programme Design consultancy
ACC is seeking a Strategic Programme Design consultancy (or consortium/collective) to help develop the foundations for implementation of the Te Tiriti o Waitangi-centred investment in building a sexual violence primary prevention system.
The tender for Request for Proposals closes on 28 October 2021.
More information is available on the Government Electronic Tenders Service (GETS), see RFx ID: 24902801.
Related news
A new report identifies the economic cost of sexual violence in New Zealand is equivalent to $6.9 billion in 2020. ACC commissioned Business and Economic Research Ltd (BERL) to produce the report, Estimate of the total economic costs of sexual violence in New Zealand (2021). The BERL media release notes that the $6.9 billion in 2020 is made up "...of $600 million to the Crown, $5.2 billion to individuals, and $1.1 billion to wider society. This represents 6.3 percent of Core-Crown expenses in 2020 ($108 billion)."
Related media
ACC apologise for failing to tell woman she was eligible for financial compensation, RNZ, 22.12.2021
Online hui first step as ACC seeks feedback on handling of sensitive claims, RNZ, 09.12.2021
ACC therapists told to watch for sexual assault survivors exaggerating symptoms, RNZ, 08.12.2021
Sexual assault survivors criticise ACC's support process, RNZ, 08.12.2021
Rape survivors sometimes denied long-term ACC treatment if they have other trauma, Stuff, 26.11.2021
Reform ACC To Support Survivors Of Sexual Violence, Press Release: Green Party, 10.11.2021
Linda Clark to head ACC client information and privacy review, RNZ, 08.11.2021
ACC to spend $44.9 million on sexual violence prevention, RNZ, 03.10.2021
ACC defends closure of specialised unit handling claims from sexual abuse victims, RNZ, 07.07.2021
Sexual violence survivors cannot wait a year for help from ACC, RNZ, 16.06.2021
The article, Getting the Story Right: Reflecting on an Indigenous Rubric to Guide the Interpretation of Mortality Data, was authored by FVDRC Chair Fiona Cram (Ngāti Pāhauwera), Senior Policy Analyst at the Health Quality & Safety Commission Heidi Cannell (Ngāti Apakura) and FVDRC Senior Specialist Pauline Gulliver.
Te Pou (2019) is a Māori responsive rubric designed to provide guidance to mortality review committees at the Health Quality & Safety Commission for interpreting and reporting on Māori mortality. Te Pou outlines four pou:
- Tika (Getting the story and the interpretation right)
- Manaakitanga (Being culturally and socially responsible)
- Mana (Advancing equity, self-determination, and social justice)
- Mahi tahi (Establishing relationships for positive change).
The authors examine how the FVDRC addressed each of the four pou when developing, writing and sharing their sixth report. The authors also discuss lessons learned and highlighted where ongoing work was required:
“[mahi tahi] is a forward facing pou—one that provides an ongoing challenge for the FVDRC to advocate for positive, transformative change for Māori and to continue to seek active engagement”
The paper further focussed on the need to:
- centre Indigenous data sovereignty
- ensure continual active engagement with Māori stakeholders
- recognise and uphold Māori rights to equity.
In concluding the authors note that Te Pou and the guidelines are not a checklist and that:
"The implementation of Te Pou requires relational practice with Māori stakeholders and an upholding of kaupapa Māori knowledge. Resources must be made available at the start of report development to ensure a partnership approach to report writing that has the flexibility to attract additional expertise where it is needed. Currently, there is a tendency to require “Māori input into the interpretation of results” at a point where data has already been collected and analyses run. The implementation of Te Pou requires that the power balance is shifted, and that culturally safe spaces are created for all phases of report development—from conceptualization to publication and subsequent follow-up engagement with stakeholders. Culturally safe spaces can be created by intentionally considering the makeup of MRCs to embed Indigenous world-views."
Te Pou was designed by Ngā Pou Arawhenua, the Māori caucus for the mortality review committees. Ngā Pou Arawhenua also developed good practice expectations and guidelines when using Te Pou. The guidelines outline culturally appropriate components that should be part of the process of writing reports and developing recommendations.
For information about the development of Te Pou and the guidelines, see the article Improving the quality of mortality review equity reporting: Development of an indigenous Māori responsiveness rubric (2020) by Denise Wilson, Sue Crengle and Fiona Cram.
Related news
The FVDRC has brought attention to the recent high number of family violence homicides in Aotearoa New Zealand writing
"While we have been otherwise distracted by level 4 lockdowns, the family violence sector has been working hard to address the escalation in violence within homes. However, as many commentators have indicated, this lockdown is a lot worse than previous experiences, and our homicide statistics tell this story. In seven weeks, we have seen eight family violence homicides. We know the experience of family violence fuels the risks of death by suicide. It is unclear how many more we have lost over this time through family violence related suicide."
The September e-update from the Joint Venture on Family Violence and Sexual Violence provides information about safety messaging related to family violence and sexual violence and COVID-19 alert levels.
Related media
The unnoticed epidemic of violence and abuse against disabled people, Stuff, 01.10.2021
Four women killed in a fortnight - justice advocates fear further deaths, Stuff, 30.09.2021
Where's the social media outrage and march for Lena Zhang Harrap?, Stuff, 28.09.2021

The consultations include opportunities to give feedback on:
- Draft Strategy to Prevent and Minimise Gambling Harm (2022/23 to 2024/25)
- National Disability Survey 2023
- Vision and ideas for an Aotearoa New Zealand that is free of racism
- Pacific Pay Gap
Draft Strategy to Prevent and Minimise Gambling Harm
The Ministry of Health is asking for feedback on the proposed future direction and content of the Ministry of Health’s Strategy to Prevent and Minimise Gambling Harm (2022/23 to 2024/25). The Ministry of Health is responsible for developing and refreshing the strategy every three years, and for implementing the strategy. You can have your say about:
- the strategic plan including the general direction and priorities
- the proposed funding levels for the Ministry, in relation to the gambling harm prevention and minimisation activities described in the strategy
- the proposed service plan, for the next three years
- the proposed problem gambling levy rates and weighting options per gambling sector, for the next three years.
The closing date to give feedback is 8 October 2021.
Find research on the links between family violence and gambling in our library.
National Disability Survey 2023
Stats NZ is asking for feedback on the content of the upcoming 2023 Disability Survey. The survey is the primary source for estimating how many people with disabilities are in Aotearoa New Zealand. It also provides information on the experiences of people with disabilities and a range of housing, economic, and wellbeing outcomes. This will be the first national disability survey to be carried out since 2013.
Submissions close on 29 October 2021.
Research published earlier this year from a population-based prevalence study found that people with disabilities experience higher rates of partner violence and non-partner violence. See our library, for more information and research about people with disabilities and family violence.
Tackling racism in Aotearoa New Zealand
The NZ Human Rights Commission (HRC) is asking the public for ideas on how to tackle racism. HRC will summarise the feedback into a report. It is expected that the government will consider the report in work on a national action plan against racism. Race Relations Commissioner Meng Foon, who is leading the initiative, explains the purpose of the initiative in a video. HRC is asking for feedback on three questions:
- "What is your vision for an Aotearoa New Zealand that is free of racism?
- What difference would a racism-free Aotearoa New Zealand make to your life?
- What are your best ideas that would enable Aotearoa New Zealand to be free of racism?"
Submissions close on 23rd November 2021.
For more information about the links between family violence and racism, search our library under racism and colonisation.
Update: The Ministry of Justice is seeking public submissions on New Zealand’s draft combined Twenty-Third and Twenty-Fourth Report to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. Submissions are open until 23 November 2021.
Pacific Pay Gap Inquiry
The NZ Human Rights Commission is also conducting an inquiry into the Pacific pay gap. The Pacific pay gap is the difference in pay between Pacific workers when compared with the highest paid group in Aotearoa - Pākehā males. The inquiry is focused on the private sector and particularly the Construction, Manufacturing, and Health and Care sectors. HRC is asking for feedback from Pacific communities about the human rights violations they are experiencing concerning pay, work conditions and career progression.
Submissions close on 30 November 2021.
For more information about the links between family violence and disadvantage, see our related news story below and search our library under the quick topic Socio-economic factors.
Related media
Minding the Gap on equal pay, RNZ, 20.10.2021 (also see Mind the Gap - Equal pay campaign from the National Council of New Zealand Women)
The unnoticed epidemic of violence and abuse against disabled people, Stuff, 01.10.2021
'Basic racism': Pacific workers struggle to get training and promotions, Stuff, 19.08.2021
The Government asked the Productivity Commission to conduct an inquiry into what immigration policy settings would best facilitate New Zealand’s long-term economic growth and promote the wellbeing of New Zealanders.
Submissions on the Immigration Settings inquiry are open until 24 December 2021. However, the Productivity Commission has also said if you have information you would like them to consider for the Preliminary Findings and Recommendations you need to make your submission before the end of September.
Update: The Productivity Commission published Preliminary findings and recommendations in November 2021.
If you have evidence or perspectives on immigration policy you think they should know about you can also contact the Commission at info@productivity.govt.nz.
To make a submission write your feedback and then upload the file through the online submission form.
The inquiry is taking a system-wide view of immigration settings. This will consider the impact of immigration on productivity and wellbeing. This could include the labour market, housing and associated infrastructure, and the natural environment.
The Productivity Commission Issues Paper (June 2021) sets out the key issues for the inquiry.
The Commission expects to publish the Preliminary findings and recommendations in October 2021. The Commission will invite submissions on these recommendations. A final report is expected to be presented to Government in April 2022.
You can subscribe to updates from the Productivity Commission.
>Update: The Productivity Commission published their final report from the inquiry, Immigration - Fit for the Future and the supporting report Immigration - by the numbers in April 2022 .
Related news and reports
On 1 August 2021 Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern formally apologised (read her speech) to Pacific communities for the Dawn Raids in the 1970s. Academic Dylan Asafo and social justice advocate Will 'Ilolahia have called for the government's apology to include amnesty and offer a pathway to residency for people who are overstaying their visas. In an article in Newsroom, Asafo argued that:
"The Government must also grant amnesty to all people who are overstaying their visas and provide them with equitable pathways to permanent residency (as Teanau and others are calling for). To do this, it must make several changes to our current immigration laws and policies that allow the racist legacy of the Dawn Raid era to persist today."
Asafo goes on to criticise issues with a primary pathway to residency, the Skilled Migrant Category Resident Visa, writing:
"While some might find this visa pathway to be fair and reasonable, these seemingly objective requirements (e.g. ‘skilled’ work experience, income level, qualification level and English language capabilities) are thinly veiled proxies for race (as well as gender, disability status and class). They operate to systematically ‘filter out’ and exclude a ‘second-class tier of migrants, most of whom are people of colour from developing countries."
The Ministry for Pacific Peoples has more information about the Dawn Raids Apology.
The final report and research briefs have been published from the Migrant and refugee women in Australia: The security and safety study (2021) from Monash University and the HarmonyAlliance: Migrant and Refugee Women for Change in Australia. The national study surveyed almost 1400 migrant and refugee women in Australia about their experiences of safety and security, with a focus on domestic and family violence. Their key findings include that temporary visa holders reported higher levels of domestic and family violence and were most likely to experience controlling behaviours and migration-related abuse and threats.
The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) published a report identifying policy issues and operational and practice issues within Immigration NZ that present barriers to migrant victims obtaining family violence visas. The report, Recent Migrant Victims of Family Violence Project 2019: Final Report (2020), describes how current policies and practices can contribute to preventing migrant women from seeking or receiving help. This can force women to choose between staying in abusive relationships or returning to their home country, or in some cases force women to return to their home country, leaving their children behind with the abusive ex/partner.
In their Concluding Observations on New Zealand's 8th periodic report, the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women highlighted issues for migrant women and their children, including women who are victims of violence and abuse. The Committee called on the government to revise immigration laws, provide support services for migrant women who are victims of violence and ensure migrant women understand their rights and can lodge complaints.
For more information about violence against women from ethnic and migrant communities, see:
NZFVC Issues Paper Ethnic perspectives on family violence in Aotearoa New Zealand (2019) by Rachel Simon-Kumar
Episode 5: Shakti of the Breaking Silence documentary series, produced by Magnetic Pictures for Stuff with the support of NZ On Air and published on RNZ
Reports published in 2020 from the Australian research project: Multicultural and settlement services supporting women experiencing violence research.
For related research and information see the quick topic searches in our library for Migrants, Refugees and Asian peoples.
Related media
Immigration - who's in, who's out, who's waiting?, RNZ, 17.08.2021
Not Kiwi enough: The iron wall that is New Zealand's immigration system, Stuff, 14.08.2021
Faafoi reviews rights of youth stuck in residency visa queue, Newsroom, 13.08.2021
Illegal: Is it time for another overstayer amnesty?, Stuff, 18.05.2021
Productivity Commission inquiry into immigration settings, Beehive media release, 03.05.2021
Māori Language Week has been celebrated each year from 1975. This year more than 1 million people joined the Māori Language Moment on 14 September. The 14 September event commemorates the presentation of the 1972 Māori language petition to parliament.
Māori Language Commissioner, Professor Rawinia Higgins, wrote in an open letter to Aotearoa:
"We were anxious not to put pressure on people this Māori Language Week because there are so many things we are being asked to do. It isn’t always easy to live in lockdown, separated from the people and places who make us who we are.
However, we also know that in our hardest times, New Zealanders turn to our first language for comfort and solidarity. For manaakitanga and kotahitanga."
Find ideas and resources to participate on www.reomaori.co.nz.
Te Reo Māori is also being celebrated with Mahuru Māori - a challenge to speak as much te reo Māori as you can for the month of September. Mahuru Māori is a reo challenge that came about as a personal social experiment by Paraone Gloyne in 2014.
Waiata Anthems Week took place the week before, on 6 - 12 September. Waiata Anthems Week is a music industry-wide initiative that celebrates new waiata and honours champions and pioneers of te reo Māori. In 2021, more than a dozen new recordings of songs from celebrated musicians of Aotearoa were released along with seven short documentaries featuring musical artists from Aotearoa about their journey to create and record their songs in te reo Māori.
E Tū Whānau resources and winners of spoken word competition
E Tū Whānau Kaimahi, Moerangi Falaoa, created Activities for Whānau to provide tautoko and awhi (support) during the rāhui (lockdown). Whaea Falaoa designed these resources to help whānau reconnect with their whakapapa and explore other areas that strengthen and build mana.
E Tū Whānau has also announced the winners of the 2021 Spoken Word Competition. Kyllah Iosua (Ngati Kahu) won first place in the Rangatahi Category for her Dreams of Diversity and Kais Valu was first place in the Open Category for his In the Eyes of my Niece. See the E Tū Whānau website for all winners.
Competition host and spoken word poet Te Kahu Rolleston said “Nowhere else have I seen such an amazing collection of spoken word poetry. It’s the voice of Aotearoa, and that’s a powerful thing.” See the E Tū Whānau YouTube Channel for all entries in the spoken word competition.
Videos from Te Ohaakii a Hine - National Network Ending Sexual Violence Together (TOAH-NNEST)
Ngā Kaitiaki Mauri of TOAH-NNEST has made a series of videos about their nine guiding kaupapa used to eliminate mahi tūkino:
- Whanaungatanga
- Kaitiakitanga
- Wairuatanga
- Ūkaipōtanga
- Pūkengatanga
- Manaakitanga
- Hauoratanga
- Mātauranga
- Rangatiratanga
To celebrate Te Wiki o Te Reo Māori TOAH-NNEST is inviting people to design a mask and submit the design for a chance to win prizes.
New single portal for COVID 19 information and support for Te Ao Māori
On 1 September 2021 Minister for Māori Development Willie Jackson announced that Te Puni Kōkiri website will provide a one-stop source of information on COVID and the vaccine roll-out for Te Ao Māori. This includes a snapshot of what's happening around the motu. Te Puni Kōkiri is also sending regular email updates. Email comms@tpk.govt.nz to sign-up for the email list.
Te Rau Ora and The Centre for Māori Suicide Prevention released the Manaaki Ora app - a self-help wellbeing app to support individuals and whānau to know what to do if they’re concerned with someone’s mental or emotional wellbeing. The free app has information and tips to help identity feelings and where to get support, and tips on how to support others.
News and information from NZFVC library in te reo Māori
Each year more and more resources are created in Te Reo Māori. See our previous news stories for some of the resources we've featured related to family and sexual violence, including resources for online safety in te reo Māori, Māori Medium sexuality education, resources on sexual and reproductive health and resource for whānau and takatāpui rangatahi. Or see all our news stories tagged with Te Ao Māori.
To support the revitalisation of te Reo Māori, the Clearinghouse uses te Reo Māori topic terms in our library. We also have a Te Reo Māori Quick Topic Search page which highlights commonly used terms. Searching by the Te Reo Māori Quick Topic Search terms will help you find material in our library that is by at least one Māori author and/or has a significant amount of content related to Māori.
Related media
Privilege and language trauma, E-Tangata, 26.09.2021 (see related articles from E-Tangata)
Understanding Māori language learners, Newsroom, 15.09.2021
Moana Maniapoto – New Waiata, Āio Ana, Waatea News, 15.09.2021
Popularity of Te Reo Māori challenge surprises organisers, RNZ, 07.09.2021
Talent behind E Tū Whānau spoken word competition no fluke, Stuff, 27.08.2021

The Chief Victims Advisor commissioned research to look at the risk of victims being coerced or controlled by perpetrators through restorative justice processes in cases involving family violence. The findings from the research have been published in a new report, The use of restorative justice in family violence cases with a focus on the possibility of victims being coerced or controlled to participate by the persons who harmed them (2021).
The research was prompted by concerns from the Chief Victims Advisor Kim McGregor and the former Parliamentary Under-Secretary to the Minister of Justice (Domestic and Sexual Violence Issues) Jan Logie about the risk of coercion and control for victims participating in restorative justice processes.
The researchers conclude "...that a restorative justice conference going ahead because of pressure on a family violence victim from the perpetrator is most unlikely in cases dealt with by specialist restorative justice practitioners." The researchers estimate that over half of restorative justice cases involving family violence do not proceed to conference because victims choose not to proceed. Restorative justice practitioners who were interviewed for the research, report in a small number of cases they would stop the process when:
- "they suspected violence was continuing
- they suspected coercion or collusion of victims and their seeming inability to say ‘no’
- the case involved a history of serious violence and/or safety concerns
- they could not establish the truth."
While the researchers conclude cases were unlikely to progress if there was coercion or control, they identify four aspects of the restorative justice process in family violence cases that create risks to victims:
- a lack of information and/or poor-quality information in referrals from court to restorative justice providers about the victim and the offender
- the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) risk assessment forms for restorative justice practitioners in family violence cases not being “fit for purpose”
- the fee-for-service funding model could incentivise restorative justice practitioners to press the victim to proceed with the restorative justice process
- a lack of relevant professional development opportunities for restorative justice practitioners including a lack of culturally relevant training.
Issues with the fee-for-service model came up a number of times in the report as an area of concern, including:
- practitioners might be incentivised to proceed to conference to receive funding
- the model does not adequately account for administrative work
- the model does fund follow-up after the conference, particularly when the practitioner has concerns for victim safety
- the model does not fund support people including the involvement of family violence prevention and social service providers
- almost all MOJ funding is for pre-sentence
- travel is not adequately compensated.
The report concludes with a number of suggestions for improvement:
- Review the current restorative justice funding model
- Improve the quality of referral information and the referral process
- Strengthen facilitator training and development including training that is relevant for kaupapa Māori approaches
- Review the Ministry of Justice risk assessment forms
- Investigate routine recording of conferences so facilitators can focus on the facilitation
- Increase diversity of restorative justice practitioners
- Strengthen connections with family violence providers including funding to support involvement
- Prioritise the readiness of participants for restorative justice over court timetables including delaying referrals until it is the right time for victims and offenders
- Investigate the use of restorative justice processes as an alternative to use of court processes
- Fund restorative justice post-sentence.
The researchers note the limitation that the research only involved interviews with service providers, and the researchers recommend "...further research be conducted directly with victims of family violence who have participated in restorative justice processes to verify the findings from this study of key stakeholders." The research draws on 20 interviews with key stakeholders. Of those, 18 were with restorative justice stakeholders and two with stakeholders from family violence support services. Seven of the 20 stakeholders were based in Kaupapa Māori organisations.
The research and report were provided by Judy Paulin, Kirimatao Paipa and Sue Carswell of Artemis Research.
The Chief Victims Advisor has also released the following reports:
- The Victims Code: An exploration of how it is being used and options for the future (June 2020)
- Independent bodies and complaint mechanisms for victims of crime (May 2020)
- Victims Rights Act 2002: How was the Act implemented and how is compliance with the Act monitored? (April 2020)
Related news
The Ministry of Justice (MOJ) announced a review of the Restorative Justice service to ensure it "...remains an appropriate and flexible justice mechanism for New Zealanders." The MOJ media release also notes that this is the first phase of a possible multi-year project taking place between June and November 2021. The first phase is focused on gathering information. MOJ is seeking to understand what’s working well and what could be improved. This information could be used to inform the future model of MOJ funded Restorative Justice in New Zealand.
MOJ is engaging with key stakeholder groups about restorative justice including court staff, judiciary, service providers, participants, police, lawyers and Māori providers and participants.
The media release notes:
"The voices of RJ [restorative justice] users will form the basis of the final recommendations submitted to Senior Ministry leadership for endorsement. The recommendations following the review will inform the next ‘service re-design’ phase and help us to future-proof the service. The endorsed recommendations report will be sent to all parties who contributed, as well as made publicly available."
The report and recommendations are expected to be published in March 2022. See the MOJ website for more information about the review and plans for stakeholder engagement. For questions about the review email the MOJ project team at RjServiceReview@justice.govt.nz.
Update: The Ministry of Justice has released a report summarising findings of a 2021 survey of victims of crime who took part in restorative justice conferences: Victim Satisfaction Survey 2021. The 2021 survey does not include data related to family and sexual violence restorative justice due to impacts of COVID-19 on the survey process. It is expected that the next Restorative Justice Victim Satisfaction Survey beginning in 2023 will include family and sexual violence.
Update: The Ministry of Justice published the final report from the review of restorative justice in July 2023. The review looked at how the restorative justice system is working and what could be improved. The Restorative Justice Review: Findings report outlines 10 recommendations including reviewing the practice standards for family violence restorative justice cases and improving training for restorative justice facilitators related to family violence.
Background information
The Ministry of Justice has produced several publications on restorative justice including standards for family violence and sexual offending.
For more information on restorative justice in family violence see the following from our recommended reading list:
Whose Justice, Whose Alternative? Locating Women’s Voice and Agency in Alternative Dispute Resolution Responses to Intimate Partner Violence by Heilman and others (2016, Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women, Center for Domestic Violence Prevention & Beyond Borders)
Domestic violence and restorative justice initiatives: Who pays if we get it wrong? by Busch R (2002, In: Strang and Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative justice and family violence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Also see the following articles and book chapters:
Reimagining VAWA: Why Criminalization Is a Failed Policy and What a Non-Carceral VAWA Could Look Like by Goodmark L, Moore AM and Gover AR (2020, Violence Against Women)
Responsive Alternatives to the Criminal Legal System in Cases of Intimate Partner Violence by Goodmark L (2019, In: Burford , Braithwaite J and Braithwaite V (Eds.), Restorative and Responsive Human Services, New York: Routledge)
Decriminalizing Domestic Violence: A Balanced Policy Approach to Intimate Partner Violence by Leigh Goodmark (2018, Oakland: University of California Press)
For more research, search our library using the Restorative Justice Quick topic search.
Related media
Victims satisfied with restorative justice, Ministry of Justice news, 10.02.2022
Dawn raids apology highlights case for cultural justice, Stuff, 07.08.2021
Review chance to improve restorative justice, Waatea News, 06.08.2021
Risk of coercion in restorative justice highlighted by Chief Victims Advisor, RNZ, 30.07.2021
Concerns victims pushed into reconciliation talks, RNZ, 30.07.2021
The closing date for submissions is 8 September 2021.
The Conversion Practices Prohibition Legislation Bill was introduced on 30 July 2021 by Justice Minister Kris Faafoi.
The purpose of the legislation is to prohibit conversion practices that seek to change or suppress a person's sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. Conversion practices are also called conversion therapy. These practices are currently legal in New Zealand.
In announcing the bill Minister Faafoi said:
“Conversion practices have no place in modern New Zealand. They are based on the false belief that any person’s sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression is broken and in need of fixing.
“Health professionals, religious leaders and human rights advocates here and overseas have spoken out against these practices as harmful and having the potential to perpetuate prejudice, discrimination and abuse towards members of rainbow communities.”
The omnibus bill would create two new criminal offences for either the most serious cases of harm or where there is heightened risk of harm. Under the proposed legislation it would be an offence to:
- perform conversion practices on individuals under the age of 18, or on those who lack decision-making capacity
- perform conversion practices that the administering person knew would cause serious harm to an individual, or was reckless in the performance of the conversion practice.
The Bill also creates a pathway for civil redress. Civil redress could involve a complaints process about conversion practices with the Human Rights Commission and the Human Rights Review Tribunal.
The bill submission webpage provides a basic overview of the proposed legislation, noting that the bill "...would make it unlawful for any person in New Zealand to:
- direct a person towards conversion practices,
- perform a conversion practice that causes serious harm, or
- arrange for a conversion practice to be performed on any person with the intention to change and supress a person’s sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression."
In February 2021, Green spokesperson for Rainbow Communities Dr Elizabeth Kerekere submitted a petition to Parliament signed by more than 157,000 people calling on the government to ban conversion therapy.
Update: The Conversion Practices Prohibition Legislation Bill passed the third reading in parliament and received Royal Assent on 18 February 2022. See responses from advocates and the Human Rights Commission in the related media below.
Response from advocates
Shaneel Lal, co-founder of the Conversion Therapy Action Group, has written an article for the Spinoff outlining changes needed in the bill to better meet the needs and rights of survivors. Shaneel has also spoken about the legislation in an interview with 95bFM.
Gender Minorities Aotearoa has written that they support the intent of the bill but are calling for changes to better protect transgender populations.
InsideOut has listed recommendations for change and important points to note when thinking about making a submission on the legislation.
Outline Aotearoa is hosting a session on Zoom on 2 September 2021 on how to write a submission. You can RSVP online for the Zoom session or find more information on the Outline Aotearoa Facebook page or Twitter page.
Rainbow Greens of Aotearoa New Zealand are hosting a session on Zoom on 5 September with Dr Elizabeth Kerekere to outline what the Bill is about and offer tips on writing a submission.
Many advocates, academics, researchers and health and social service providers have welcomed the bill and discussed key points of the proposed legislation. See related media below for more information.
Related news
The Governance and Administration Committee is inviting submissions on changes proposed in supplementary order paper (SOP) 59 on the Births, Deaths, Marriages, and Relationships Registration Bill. The closing date for submissions is 14 September 2021.
The Committee has opened an inquiry into the changes proposed in supplementary order paper (SOP) 59. The inquiry is focused on the provisions in the SOP which would change the process by which people can self-identify their sex on their birth records. The Committee is calling for submissions on the inquiry, noting:
"The SOP aims to provide better support for the needs of transgender, non-binary, and intersex communities. Similar changes to self-identification provisions were recommended by the Governance and Administration Committee of the 52nd Parliament when it first considered the bill. However, these changes were recommended after the public consultation process on the bill had concluded. To allow the public to have its say on the self-identification provisions the Governance and Administration Committee of this Parliament has opened this inquiry."
The Births, Deaths, Marriages and Relationships Registration (BDMRR) Bill was introduced in 2017. The Department of Internal Affairs notes that the bill was put on hold in 2019 after the Select Committee introduced changes to the Bill to make it easier for people to amend the sex recorded on their birth certificate. Internal Affairs Minister Jan Tinetti is proposing improvements to the self-identification process recommended by the Select Committee in 2018 through the Supplementary Order Paper (SOP).
Gender Minorities Aotearoa has published a BDMRR submission guide.
Update: The Governance and Administration Committee has provided their report on the Inquiry into Supplementary Order Paper No 59 on the Births, Deaths, Marriages, and Relationships Registration Bill. Gender Minorities Aotearoa has provided a more detailed update on their response to the Committee's report on the Inquiry.
Update: Parliament has passed the legislation. It is due to come into effect in 2023, allowing the government time to consult next year on the regulations to implement the legislation.
Related media
Rainbow advocates slam delay of self-ID process for people born overseas, Stuff, 07.04.2023
LGBTQIA+ advocates back Green Party's call for a ministry for rainbow communities, Stuff, 18.02.2022
Conversion therapy bill passes at Parliament, RNZ, 16.02.2022
Former pastor subjected to conversion practices celebrates ban, One News, 16.02.2022
Conversion therapy will soon be illegal in New Zealand, at last, Re:News, 15.02.2022
Cracking on with preventing anti-LBGTQI harm, RNZ, 09.02.2022
Trans researcher celebrates passing of BDMRR Bill, RNZ, 10.12.2021
Parliament unanimously passes bill allowing change to birth certificates, RNZ, 09.12.2021
1 in 20 adults identify as LGBT+ in major social survey, Stats NZ news, 12.11.2021
Explainer: The decades-long battle for gender self-identification, Stuff, 07.11.2021
Govt delivers more wellbeing support to Rainbow young people, Beehive media release, 29.09.2021
Threshold for 'serious harm' too high in conversion therapy bill, say submitters, Stuff, 17.09.2021
Conversion therapy ban bill: Submitters call for stronger law, RNZ, 16.09.2021

The Adolescent Health Research Group has published a new report that explores health and wellbeing among East Asian, South Asian, Chinese and Indian secondary school students in Aotearoa.
The report, East Asian, South Asian, Chinese and Indian Students in Aotearoa: A Youth19 Report (2021), draws on data from the Youth19 Rangatahi Smart Survey (Youth19). More than 7000 young people in Aotearoa New Zealand were surveyed in Youth19 including 26% who identified with an Asian ethnic group.
The survey asks a range of questions about health and wellbeing including witnessing or experiencing family violence and unwanted sexual contact.
Across all Asian ethnic groups, young people were more likely to report witnessing violence (an adult hitting or physically hurting another adult or child) at home in the previous 12 months compared to European students (6%):
- 12% of East Asian students
- 14% of South Asian students; this was higher for South Asian females (17%) than males (11%)
- 12% of Chinese students
- 13% of Indian students
Across all Asian ethnic groups, young people were also more likely to report they had been hit or physically hurt by an adult at home in the previous 12 months compared to European students (6%):
- 12% of East Asian students
- 14% of South Asian students; this was higher for South Asian females (17%) than males (10%)
- 11% of Chinese students; this was higher for Chinese females (13%) than males (8%)
- 13% of Indian students
Within all Asian ethnic groups, more females than males reported ‘yes’ or ‘unsure’ to having been touched in a sexual way or made to do sexual things they did not want to do at some time (including sexual abuse or rape):
- 16% of East Asian students; females (19%) than males (12%)
- 13% of South Asian students; females (20%) than males (6%)
- 13% of Chinese students; females (17%) than males (9%)
- 13% of Indian students; females (20%) than males (5%)
This compares to 16% of all European students.
Other key findings include:
- one in four Asian students reported being treated unfairly by a teacher because of their ethnicity.
- 10% of Asian students reported being bullied in school because of their ethnicity or religion.
- 45% of Asian students felt unsafe in their neighbourhood.
- Many Asian students reported significant rates of emotional and mental distress.
- Compared to European students, South Asian students in general, and Indian students in particular, were more likely to report household poverty.
- Compared to European students, East Asian students and Chinese students were more likely to experience significant depressive symptoms and less likely to access health care compared to their European students.
The Executive summary of the report notes:
"The use of the term ‘Asian’ is problematic as this population is not a single ethnic category. Aggregating all Asian peoples in one group fails to celebrate the heterogeneity in the group and masks important differences with an averaging effect. Whilst aggregated data are extensively used for policy and planning, this aggregation can provide misleading information relating to individual Asian ethnicities. In separate sections of this report, we disaggregate Asian youth data to provide health and wellbeing data specific to East Asian students and South Asian students as two broader ethnic groupings, followed by information specific to Chinese students and Indian students (the two largest Asian ethnic groups among the survey respondents)."
“Getting away from that overly broad ‘Asian’ label opens up opportunities for targeted interventions,” says Dr Peiris-John, co-director of the Centre for Asian and Ethnic Minority Health Research and Evaluation at the University of Auckland and lead author of the report.
The report outlines specific recommendations for schools and communities, service providers, the Ministry of Health, funding agencies, policymakers and planners, and researchers and evaluators.
For more information about the report see the related Youth19 webinar.
Other publications from the Youth19 survey include the report Negotiating Multiple Identities: Intersecting Identities among Māori, Pacific, Rainbow and Disabled Young People (2021) and a number of fact sheets and briefs. All publications from Youth19 are available at www.youth19.ac.nz.
This is the 4th survey of secondary school students. Reports from previous surveys are available from the Adolescent Health Research Group.
Update: A brief summarising findings on student feelings of safety and experiences of physical and sexual violence between 2001 and 2019 has been published.
Related media
Asian youths face significant mental health challenges, report finds, Stuff, 28.06.2021

As part of our journey towards placing Te Tiriti o Waitangi at the centre of what we do, the NZFVC is seeking to appoint an Academic Director - Māori and an Academic Director - Tauiwi to support the work of the Clearinghouse and to contribute to the development of a new mission, values and purpose.
The Academic Directors will work collaboratively with two new Advisory Groups (Māori/Tauiwi) and the NZFVC Kaiwhakahaere/Manager, with the overall goal of building and communicating strong evidence based insights for the prevention and effective response to family, whānau and sexual violence in Aotearoa.
These are advisory appointments for either senior academics (likely at Senior Lecturer level or above but negotiable depending on the candidate) or suitably qualified and experienced professional research entity candidates with key leadership responsibilities. For more detailed information including how to apply, please refer to the advertisement on the UniServices website.
The two roles are Fixed Term (appointment initially for 1 year) and 0.1 FTE (4 hours per week).
Advisory Groups
We are also looking to engage two new Advisory Groups (Māori/Tauiwi). We are looking for people who:
- Bring expert knowledge in family, whanau and sexual violence and/or professional skills that can support the aims of the Clearinghouse.
- Reflect the diverse communities impacted by family, whānau and sexual violence, including those with lived experience.
If you have any questions about either the Director roles or the Advisory Groups please contact charlotte.moore@auckland.ac.nz
The closing date for EOIs is 5pm Tuesday 31st of August.

No results found.
Please try different keywords or filter options.